A comparison of the effect of bi-level positive airway pressure and
synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in preterm infants with
respiratory distress syndrome
Abstract
Background: Bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) and synchronized
intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) can be used to achieve peak
inspiratory pressure and positive end-expiratory pressure to avoid
alveolar collapse and improve oxygenation in preterm infants during the
treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), and there is an urgent
demand for evaluating the effects and prognoses of these two ventilation
modes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on preterm infants (≤
32 weeks and < 2500 g) from March 2015 to March 2020 with
BiPAP (n = 63) and SIMV (n = 63). The primary outcomes were successful
treatment and weaning within 72 hours, the demand for a second pulmonary
surfactant supply and the need for a second respiratory support. The
secondary outcome was the incidence of complications. Results: There
were no significant differences (P>0.05) in the primary
outcomes or the incidence of complications (pneumonia, apnoea,
respiratory failure, air leak syndrome, persistence of patent ductus
arteriosus, neonatal sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, retinopathy of
prematurity, and intraventricular haemorrhage). There were significant
differences (P<0.05) in the incidence of pulmonary
haemorrhage, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and IVH (≥ grade II).
Conclusion: Although both BiPAP and SIMV achieved good early treatment
outcomes of RDS in preterm infants, BiPAP support is recommended for
reducing the incidence of pulmonary haemorrhage, bronchopulmonary
dysplasia and IVH (≥ grade II) if infants are tolerant. Attempts should
be made to prevent these complications from happening with the use of
SIMV support if infants are intolerant.