loading page

The ecology of aboveground terrestrial eDNA: Its state, transport, and fate on aboveground surfaces
  • +2
  • Rafael Valentin,
  • Kathleen Kyle,
  • Michael Allen,
  • Dustin Welbourne,
  • Julie Lockwood
Rafael Valentin
Princeton University
Author Profile
Kathleen Kyle
Rutgers University
Author Profile
Michael Allen
Rutgers University
Author Profile
Dustin Welbourne
University of Florida
Author Profile
Julie Lockwood
Rutgers University
Author Profile


Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis has become a valuable tool for detecting aquatic and terrestrial species for monitoring efforts and site biodiversity assessments. However, if aboveground terrestrial eDNA surveys are to be widely adopted, it is necessary to first understand how terrestrial conditions affect the state, transport, and ultimate fate (or ‘ecology’) of terrestrially deposited eDNA. Many of the processes that affect the state, transport, and fate of eDNA in aquatic environments may not be applicable in aboveground systems, warranting an exploration of the terrestrial processes that likely do affect eDNA. Here we explore the ecology of aboveground terrestrial eDNA through a series of experiments evaluating the optimal filter pore size for intracellular eDNA collection, how eDNA is affected by rain events, and its degradation rate under different solar radiation conditions. We found that the captured concentration of intracellular eDNA was not significantly affected by an increase in filter pore size, suggesting there is a wide range of viable pore size options for targeting intracellular eDNA. We also found extracellular eDNA degrades more rapidly than intracellular forms when exposed to solar radiation, indicating the latter is a more viable target for collection. Finally, we identified that rainfall or mist will remove most terrestrial eDNA present on vegetation substrate. This study provides researchers and managers key insights into successfully designing and carrying out terrestrial eDNA surveys that maximize detection probability and minimize false positive results.

Peer review status:UNDER REVIEW

01 Sep 2020Submitted to Molecular Ecology
09 Sep 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned