loading page

Single-Point Left Ventricular Pacing Optimized by ECG Results in Better Resynchronization than Multipoint Pacing
  • +19
  • Rodolfo San Antonio,
  • Eduard Guasch,
  • Ana González-Ascaso,
  • Rafael Jiménez-Arjona,
  • Andreu Climent,
  • Margarida Pujol-Lopez,
  • Adelina Doltra,
  • Francisco Alarcón,
  • Paz Garre,
  • Alejandro Liberos,
  • Omar Trotta,
  • Levio Quinto,
  • Roger Borràs,
  • Elena Arbelo,
  • Ivo Roca-Luque,
  • Felipe Atienza,
  • Josep Brugada,
  • Francisco Fernández-Avilés,
  • María Guillem,
  • Marta Sitges,
  • Jose Maria Tolosana,
  • Luis Mont Girbau
Rodolfo San Antonio
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Eduard Guasch
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Author Profile
Ana González-Ascaso
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia
Author Profile
Rafael Jiménez-Arjona
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Author Profile
Andreu Climent
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia
Author Profile
Margarida Pujol-Lopez
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Author Profile
Adelina Doltra
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Author Profile
Francisco Alarcón
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Author Profile
Paz Garre
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Author Profile
Alejandro Liberos
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia
Author Profile
Omar Trotta
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Author Profile
Levio Quinto
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Author Profile
Roger Borràs
Hospital Clínic
Author Profile
Elena Arbelo
Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona;
Author Profile
Ivo Roca-Luque
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Author Profile
Felipe Atienza
Gregorio Maranon General University Hospital Cardiology Service
Author Profile
Josep Brugada
Hospital Clinic
Author Profile
Francisco Fernández-Avilés
Gregorio Maranon General University Hospital Cardiology Service
Author Profile
María Guillem
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia
Author Profile
Marta Sitges
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Author Profile
Jose Maria Tolosana
Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona;
Author Profile
Luis Mont Girbau
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Author Profile

Abstract

Background: Multipoint pacing (MPP) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) activates the left ventricle from two locations, thereby shortening the QRS duration and enabling better resynchronization; however, compared with conventional CRT, MPP reduces battery longevity. On the other hand, electrocardiogram-based optimization using the fusion-optimized intervals (FOI) method achieves more significant reverse remodeling than nominal CRT programming. Our study aimed to determine whether MPP could attain better resynchronization than single-point pacing (SPP) optimized by FOI. Methods: This prospective study included 32 consecutive patients who successfully received CRT devices with MPP capabilities. After implantation, the QRS duration was measured during intrinsic rhythm and with three pacing configurations: MPP, SPP-FOI, and MPP-FOI. In 14 patients, biventricular activation times (by electrocardiographic imaging, ECGI) were obtained during intrinsic rhythm and for each pacing configuration to validate the findings. Device battery longevity was estimated at the 45-day follow-up. Results: The SPP-FOI method achieved greater QRS shortening than MPP (-56±16 vs. -42±17 ms, P<0.001). Adding MPP to the best FOI programming did not result in further shortening (MPP-FOI: - 58±14 ms, P=0.69). Furthermore, the biventricular activation time according to ECGI was also shorter with SPP-FOI than with MPP. The estimated battery longevity was longer with SPP than with MPP (8.1±2.3 vs. 6.3±2.0 years, P=0.03). Conclusions: SPP optimized by FOI resulted in better resynchronization and longer battery duration than MPP.