Comparison of open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in
octogenarians at a single center
Abstract
Aim: Although the advantages of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in
the general population have been shown, its role in octogenarians has
yet to be elucidated. This retrospective study compared laparoscopic and
open inguinal hernia repair in octogenarians; the experience was
summarized to aid in selecting surgical and anesthesia options in this
age group. Materials and methods: The data of octogenarians who
underwent laparoscopic (n = 81) or open (n = 121) inguinal hernia repair
in our center from January 2017 to December 2019 were collected.
Statistical analysis variables included basic epidemiological data of
patients, anesthesia methods, surgical procedures, comorbidities,
postoperative pain, complications, recurrence, and other data. Results:
There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of
sex, body mass index, recurrent hernias, comorbidities, postoperative
complications, and recurrence. The American Society of Anesthesiologists
(ASA) class and the proportion of scrotal hernias in the open group were
higher than those of the laparoscopic group, whereas the proportion of
bilateral hernias in the laparoscopic group was higher than that in the
open group. The postoperative pain scores of the laparoscopic group were
lower than those of the open group. The proportion of patients with ASA
class III–IV was highest in patients receiving local anesthesia, and
the proportion of bilateral hernias was higher in the patients receiving
general anesthesia than that in those receiving local or spinal
anesthesia. Conclusion: In octogenarians, both laparoscopic and open
inguinal hernia repair are safe and feasible, but an appropriate surgery
and anesthesia plan should be determined according to the patient’s
specific conditions.