loading page

LUNG ULTRASOUND IN RULING OUT COVID-19 AMONG HEALTHCARE WORKERS IN TWO ITALIAN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS: A MULTICENTER STUDY.
  • +7
  • Roberto Copetti,
  • Giulia Amore,
  • Caterina Giudice,
  • Daniele Orso,
  • Silvia Cola,
  • Pierpaolo Pillinini,
  • Chiara Rocco,
  • Dario Cappello,
  • Alessia Dibenedetto,
  • Stefano Meduri
Roberto Copetti
Latisana Hospital

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Giulia Amore
Latisana Hospital
Author Profile
Caterina Giudice
Latisana Hospital
Author Profile
Daniele Orso
University of Udine
Author Profile
Silvia Cola
Latisana Hospital
Author Profile
Pierpaolo Pillinini
Hospital of Tolmezzo (UD)
Author Profile
Chiara Rocco
Hospital of Tolmezzo (UD)
Author Profile
Dario Cappello
Hospital of Tolmezzo (UD)
Author Profile
Alessia Dibenedetto
Hospital of Tolmezzo (UD)
Author Profile
Stefano Meduri
Latisana Hospital
Author Profile

Abstract

Purpose: The high percentage of asymptomatic patients and the non-high sensitivity of real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test on nasopharyngeal swab cause some healthcare workers to be infected but asymptomatic and a source of spread of the epidemic. This study aimed to verify if the lung ultrasound (LUS) had enough high negative predictive value to rule out coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among a population of healthcare workers operating in the Emergency Department. Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted, enrolling healthcare workers among the staff of two Emergency Departments in Northeast Italy. The definitive diagnosis of COVID-19 was established by an adjudication committee, based on the clinical data and RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swab result. Results: From March 30, 2020, to April 22, 2020, we enrolled 155 cases. The adjudication committee determined two true positives for COVID-19. Twenty-one healthcare workers presented suggestive symptoms (2 true positives and 19 false positives). The nasopharyngeal swab was positive in one case (1 false-negative case). LUS was suggestive for COVID-19 pneumonia in 4 cases (2 false-positive cases). The diagnostic accuracy of LUS was 98.7% (95% CI 95.4%-99.8%). The sensitivity and the specificity of LUS were 100% (95% CI 15.8% -100%) and 98.7% (95% CI 95.4% - 99.8%), respectively. The negative predictive value was 100% (95% CI 100% -100%). Conclusion: LUS has a good enough negative predictive value for ruling out COVID-19 in a population of healthcare workers exposed to COVID-19.