loading page

Theoretical Insight into 20-Electron Transition-Metal Complexes (C5H5)2TM(E1E2)2 (TM = Cr, Mo, W; E1E2 = CO, N2, BF): Stabilities, Electronic Structures, and Bonding Nature
  • +5
  • Song Xu,
  • Mengyang Li,
  • Gerui Pei,
  • Xintian Zhao,
  • Jianzhi Xu,
  • Chuncai Kong,
  • Zhimao Yang,
  • Tao Yang
Song Xu
Xi'an Jiaotong University
Author Profile
Mengyang Li
Xi'an Jiaotong University
Author Profile
Gerui Pei
Xi'an Jiaotong University
Author Profile
Xintian Zhao
Xi'an Jiaotong University
Author Profile
Jianzhi Xu
Xi'an Jiaotong University
Author Profile
Chuncai Kong
Xi'an Jiaotong University
Author Profile
Zhimao Yang
Xi'an Jiaotong University
Author Profile
Tao Yang
Xi'an Jiaotong University
Author Profile

Abstract

A systematic first-principles study is performed to investigate the 20-electron transition metal complexes (C5H5)2TM(E1E2)2 (TM = Cr, Mo, W; E1E2 = CO, N2, BF). The bond dissociation energy (De) based on (C5H5)2TM(E1E2)2 → (C5H5)2TM(E1E2) + E1E2 indicates much lower thermodynamic stability of (C5H5)2TM(N2)2 because of poor binding ability of N2 ligands. For the thermodynamic stable (C5H5)2TM(E1E2)2 complexes (TM = Cr, Mo, W; E1E2 = CO, BF), their 20-electron nature is derived from their occupied nonbonding molecular orbital mainly donated by ligands. Furthermore, charge transfer from TMs to the C5H5 ligands is revealed by the atoms in molecules (AIM) theory, leading to the positive charges of the TM atoms. On the other hand, the nature of the TM-E1 bond has been thoroughly analyzed by the energy decomposition analysis (EDA) method. The absolute value of interaction energies (|ΔEint|) between (C5H5)2TM(E1E2) and E1E2 has the same trend as the corresponding bond dissociation energy and Wiberg bond orders of TM-E1 bonds, following the order W > Mo > Cr with same ligands and BF > CO with same TM. Additionally, the largest contribution to the ΔEint values is the repulsive term ΔEPauli. Similar contributions from covalent and electrostatic terms to the TM-E1 bonds were found, which can be described as the classic dative bond with nearly same σ and π contributions. The stronger σ donations and π backdonations in (C5H5)2TM(BF)2 than in (C5H5)2TM(CO)2 indicate much more stability of (C5H5)2TM(BF)2.

Peer review status:UNDER REVIEW

07 Jun 2021Submitted to International Journal of Quantum Chemistry
08 Jun 2021Assigned to Editor
08 Jun 2021Submission Checks Completed
08 Jun 2021Reviewer(s) Assigned