Risk of Recurrent Adverse Outcomes in Gestational Diabetes: a
Retrospective Cohort Study
Abstract
Objective: Compare the risk of recurrent adverse delivery outcome (ADO)
or adverse neonatal outcome (ANO) between consecutive gestational
diabetes (GDM) pregnancies. Design: Retrospective cohort Setting:
Sydney, Australia Population or Sample: 424 pairs of consecutive
singleton GDM pregnancies, 2003-2015 Main Outcome Measures:. ADO:
instrumental delivery and emergency Caesarean. ANO: large for
gestational age (LGA), small for gestational age (SGA), and composite
ANO (LGA/SGA/stillbirth/neonatal death/shoulder dystocia). Methods:
Using each pregnancy pair (“index” and “subsequent” pregnancy), we
calculated ADO and ANO rates and determined risk factors for subsequent
pregnancy outcomes (multivariate regression). Results: Subsequent
pregnancies had higher rates of elective Caesarean (30.4% vs 17.0%,
p<0.001) and lower rates of instrumental delivery (5% vs
13.9%, p<0.001), emergency Caesarean (7.1% vs 16.3%,
p<0.001) and vaginal delivery (62.3% vs 66.3%, p=0.01). ANO
rates in index and subsequent pregnancies did not differ. Index
pregnancy adverse outcome was associated with a higher risk of repeat
outcome: RR 3.09 (95%CI:1.30, 7.34) for instrumental delivery, RR 2.20
(95%CI:1.06, 4.61) for emergency Caesarean, RR 4.55 (95%CI:3.03, 6.82)
for LGA, RR 5.01 (95%CI:2.73, 9.22) for SGA and RR 2.10 (95%CI:1.53,
2.87) for composite ANO). The greatest risk factor for subsequent LGA
(RR 3.13 (95%CI:2.20, 4.47)), SGA (RR 4.71 (95%CI:2.66, 8.36)) or
composite ANO (RR 2.01 (95%CI:1.46, 2.78)) was having the same outcome
in the index pregnancy. Conclusions: Women with GDM and an adverse
outcome are at very high risk of the same complication in their
subsequent GDM pregnancy, representing a high-risk group that should be
targeted for directed management over routine care.