The regional homophily is the most substantive predictor in the attributive models. It is possible to speculate that a strong regional effect is the peculiar trait of Kazakhstani civil society because a large territory fosters the development of “natural” federalism. Thus, civic network in our case is partitioned on the basis of regional affiliation; the effect of homophily of “globalizing” NGOs is notably less substantive. However these effects should be considered as supplementary factors of tie formation processes. Regional homophily forms social bonds (Baldassarrri & Diani, 2007), or clusters of long-term relations between organizations. Although homophily among fully globally integrated NGOs is not so strong, it can be considered as one of the key resources that allows to overcome regional closure. Thus, globally integrated civic organizations serve as kind of hubs or brokers due to their remarkable status which enables them to connect separated regional clusters. At the same time, results demonstrate that popularity of globally integrated organizations does not contribute into the in-degree variance over and above that associated with their homophily. In other words, homophilious regional clusters are connected by homophilious ties between globally integrated organizations.