Civil society literature contains controversial perspectives on how international aid, mainly in monetary forms, may determine behavior of recipients and civil society on the whole. Some scholars assert that relations between global-local integration can be defined as negative (Nezhina & Ibrayeva, 2013; Spires, 2011b; Bob, 2005; Henderson, 2002; Mendelson & Glenn, 2002; Luong & Weinthal, 1999). The growth and/or strengthening of one destroys another. The main idea of these critics can be summarized as follows: “[t]he danger is that organizations with transnational links will be more oriented to their foreign contacts, partners, or donors than to their members or other domestic organizations” (Stark, Vedres, & Bruszt, 2006: 324), or as James Richter puts it “western assistance can reach only a fraction of the formally registered organizations and runs the risk of drawing these organizations away from their domestic roots and embedding them instead in a network of international NGOs and third-sector professionals” (Richter, 2002: 80).