Literally following Stark and his associates (Stark, Vedres, & Bruszt, 2006), we pose the question: “Can civic organizations be both locally rooted and globally connected?”, limiting ourselves, however, to post-soviet context of Kazakhstan. In general, this question stems from encompassing discussion about transnationalization of states, economies, and civil society that incorporates local actors into networks exceeding national boundaries. Despite scholars have long-standing interest in understanding how globalization affects local civil society (von Bülow, 2010; Stark, Vedres, & Bruszt, 2006; Mendelson & Glenn, 2002; Stacey & Aksartova, 2001), such definitions as global-local integration are still open for ambiguous interpretations, and many of them are incomplete and controversial (von Bülow, 2010: 5-6; for a review of different forms of global integration, see also Khagram, Riker, & Sikkink, 2003). In this paper we follow Stark, Vedres and Bruszt (2006), who suggest comprehensive classification of possible forms of global and local integration. They offer seven possible types of collaboration with international donors and/or partners (2006: 333). For our analysis, we opted to define NGOs as being global if it receives monetary aid from any international donor. This type of global integration is possible to classify as the most significant.