So coming back to the main motive of the article, we are going to propose models reflecting arguments of competing scholars, and then assess their adequacy by aforementioned methods. At the first, we shortly reformulate general ideas discussed so far. According to David Stark, Balazs Vedres and Laszlo Bruszt (2006) globally integrated NGOs are better involved into a local civil network. This implies that nodes that marked ‘global’ civic organizations receive more ties than others, which have to affect network structure in such a way that we would observe nodes with specific attribute receiving a tie more frequently than expected by chance. At the same time, critics of global integration stressed (honestly quite unclear) on homophilious character of contacts of globally integrated organizations. In other words, globally integrated NGOs would form ties with each other more frequently than might be expected by chance.