The results of the experiment showed that filtering the recorded values gives marked improvement over raw values, less than a 3 m error for filtered values compared to a 6 m error for raw values. They also showed that the optimum window size for sampling was 0.5 to 2 seconds. Accuracy was better as the beacon transmission rates were increased, although with diminishing returns, as 10 Hz was negligibly different than 20 Hz. The greater the number of beacons detected in a fingerprint measurement, the greater the accuracy, up to about 8-10 beacons. Finally, the authors show that BLE positioning accuracy via fingerprinting achieved < 2.6 m accuracy, compared to WiFi, which returned < 8.5 m accuracy.