General Comments and Feedback
Number of Hours Spent to Review the Report:
Quality of the Report (DROPDOWN MENU):
Superior, Good, Fair, Poor
 
Rate the importance of this report to clinical practice and research and usability in the following categories:
 
1. Contribution to the Existing Literature (1 high importance/level of contribution, 2 moderate importance/level of contribution, 3 minor importance/level of contribution, 4 not important/minor contribution)
Comments:__________________
 
2. Scientific Validity (1 valid, 2 largely valid, but needs some clarification or revision, 3 not valid)
Comments: ____________________
 
3. Clarity (1 clear and understandable, 2 largely clear, but needs some clarifications or revision, 3 unclear)
Comments: _________________________
[USEFUL TO ASK HOW THE REPORT COULD BE MADE MORE USEFUL TO GENERAL PUBLIC/CONSUMERS? OR NON-SPECIALISTS?]
4. Copyediting (1 minimal errors 2 moderate errors 3 requires close editing)
Comments: ________________________
 
[ADD READABILITY ALSO?? THIS MAY OPEN UP SOME PROGRAMMATIC CHANGES??? E.G., OVERALL READABILITY (SCALE OF x-x), USE OF ACRONYMS (APPROPRIATE, INAPPROPRIATE), LANGUAGE]
 
5. Abstract: Does the abstract appropriately summarize the report without omitting important results or inappropriately reporting findings: Yes/No Comment: ____________________________
[USEFUL TO HAVE A QUESTION HERE (OR MAYBE AS A SUPPLEMENTARY PIECE THAT REVIEWERS CAN ELECT TO COMPLETE) TO HELP THE PROGRAM IN PLANNING OR THE EC IN CREATING USER PRODUCTS? SOMETHING LIKE, WHAT ARE THE KEY MESSAGES FOR STAKEHOLDERS? ]
Specific Comments and Feedback
Report Section
Points to
Consider in
Your Review
Your
Comment
PDF Line #
Importance of
Comment
Major (requires significant revision to clarify/correct;
authors will provide thorough response)
Minor (requires minimal or no revision;
does not affect report significantly and
may not be addressed in detail by the report authors)
Copyediting/Linguistic (issues with grammar,
word choice, spelling)

[these would be rows in the table, but for ease in editing, I did not make them rows]
Executive Summary
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion: General
Discussion: Future Reserach
Discussion: Clinical Implications
Discussion: Limitations
Conclusions
General Comments