DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4725424.v1
Central to a strong NanoSafety Cluster (NSC) is efficient dissemination of knowledge. However, the flood of peer-reviewed literature requires one to make a selection of articles to read. Indeed, in the period 2003-2013 the number of nanosafety papers increased from just 60 published during 2003 to 2846 published in 2013 \cite{Krug_2014}, and that trend has certainly continued through 2016. Twenty years ago, PhD students would just read the table of contents a selection of journals. Rich Site Summary (RSS) feeds are the modern  reincarnation of this process \cite{Murray_Rust_2004}. At the same time, research has become a lot more interdisciplinary and nanosafety research is an eminent example of that. NYU new-media professor Clay Shirky explained, however, that it is not an information overload, but a filter fail \cite{citeulike:14277856}. It is not that we have too much to read, but that we fail to select the right papers to read. That requires intelligent indexing, allowing readers to find the articles specifically about the nanomaterial they are interested in, with exactly that biological effect they expect or found in their own work.
Where the eNanoMapper project developed a search engine to filter nanomaterial data (http://search.data.enanomapper.net/) \cite{Jeliazkova_2015}, ScienceOpen provides a website to search and filter literature. One of the newer features allows the creation of collections papers on a specific topic or from a specific group of authors. Using a long list of DOIs with papers up to 2014 from EC-funded projects under the NSC umbrella, we created a collection of articles: https://www.scienceopen.com/collection/EUNanoSafety (see Fig. 1).