Fig. 11 shows that the design solution with the highest utility degree is the Case 4, reinforced concrete frame with rectified bricks, (100%), followed by the Case 3, reinforced concrete frame with cellular concrete blocks, (75.4%), and Case 2, X-Lam and wood fiber, (20.8%). The Case 6 and 5 obtained similar results of the actual design solution of the building. The Case 5 obtained a negative utility degree (-7,1) despite having a positive cost. Although this criterion is the most determinant, it has not changed the priority of design strategies because in the other parameters the Case 5 has not achieved a good performance.