Discussion
Conclusion
Shortly (5 lines) recall the problematics and the working hypothesis with some contextual elements, and indicate to what extent you have been able to verify it.
References
List here the list of articles, reports and web pages to which you referred in your manuscript.
These references must be abbreviated in the body of the text. Here is an example: "Richard Feynman gives several interesting examples that reveal the misdeeds of pseudo-sciences (Feynman 2010)"
And in the references at the end of the article, this element should appear as follows:
- Feynman, R.P. (2000) Vous voulez rire, monsieur Feynman ! Odile Jacob. Paris.
Use alphabetical order.
Contributions of the authors
(the data part was made by ML, the method is detailed by RT, the results and the discussion are explained by NJ explain who did what in writing the manuscript, processing the data, crweating maps, etc. For example: “SJ and RG looked for references and drafted the state of the art, SJ, RG, and CS wrote the introduction and conclusion, CS performed the calculations and wrote the results section, SJ and CS have elaborated thematic maps”)