Although it hasn't been implemented into British criminal law, the
principles outlined within the bill as still taken into consideration
when presenting evidence in court to ensure that the evidence is
presented correctly and fairly to avoid bias by ensuring that all the
evidence is presented under two competing hypotheses. Cases such as the
Jill Dando and Sally Clark case which saw how improper evidence that
hasn't been considered correctly can lead to false prosecutions of
suspects who were later acquitted, due to the evidence against them
becoming biased, as it wasn't considered under two competing hypotheses.