Although it hasn't been implemented into British criminal law, the principles outlined within the bill as still taken into consideration when presenting evidence in court to ensure that the evidence is presented correctly and fairly to avoid bias by ensuring that all the evidence is presented under two competing hypotheses. Cases such as the Jill Dando and Sally Clark case which saw how improper evidence that hasn't been considered correctly can lead to false prosecutions of suspects who were later acquitted, due to the evidence against them becoming biased, as it wasn't considered under two competing hypotheses.