Using this method a best estimate for the actual speed of light with error was made as \(\left(2.7\ \pm0.1\right)\ x\ 10^8\ \frac{m}{s}\) 

Our value for the speed of light fell well outside of the range of the actual value of the speed of light given the uncertainty in our best guess. I do however believe that this discrepancy is not do to systematic error but instead do to random error given the difficulty in our ability to evaluate the actual change in time for each returning pulse. This error could be reduced by increasing the number of intervals at which we took measurements from but this as well has a maximum value discerned by our ability to tell the difference between starting points of incoming pulses from the photo-detector. Given careful scrutiny, at best we might obtain roughly twice as many data points which I do not believe would be statistically significant.