Figure legends
Fig.1 Schematic showing the different metrics of resilience
applied to an example time series. Grey lines and filled points
indicate simulated yield data for a single hectad. A) Illustrates
relative function, being derived from the average difference (area
between lines shaded in light grey) between the hectad (mid-grey lines
and points) and national average yields (light grey lines and points)
across the time series. B) Illustrates yield stability, derived from the
difference (vertical black arrows) between yield in any one year and the
average yield over the two years either side (horizontal, dashed black
bars). C) Illustrates resistance, derived from the proportional drop in
yield (vertical black arrow) in 2012 from the pre-2012 mean (horizontal,
dashed black bar). Note that, for analyses, the inverse of the latter
two metrics is taken, such that higher values indicate higher resilience
in all cases.
Fig.2 Partial residual plots of the explanatory variables in the
‘best’-fitting models for each response variable. Plots show the effect
of a given landscape composition or configuration variable after
removing variance from random and other fixed effects in the model
(Including environmental zone and potential yield) for each of A)
relative function, B) yield stability, C) resistance. Abbreviations on
axis labels are SNH = semi-natural habitat, SNG = semi-natural grassland
Fig. 3 Example hectads (10km squares) from a single
environmental zone predicted to have the maximum and minimum resilience
values by the ‘best’-fitting models for each response variable. For all
plots, shading indicates land cover type, with pale grey being arable
land, mid-grey being deciduous woodland and black being semi-natural
grassland. White areas indicate other land cover types (e.g. urban
areas, improved grassland).