References
- The Economist. Childbirth Caesar’s legions - The global rise of
Caesarean sections is being driven not by medical necessity but by
growing wealth—and perverse financial incentives for doctors.The Economist , from the print edition, August 15th 2015, New
York and São Paulo
(http://www.economist.com/node/21660974/print).
- Domingues RMSM, Dias MAB, Nakamura-Pereira M, Torres JA, d’Orsi E,
Pereira APE, Schilithz AOC, Leal MC. Process of decision-making
regarding the mode of birth in Brazil: from the initial preference of
women to the final mode of birth. Cad. Saúde Pública 2014; 30
Sup: S101-S116.
- Klein G. Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press 1999.
- Gigerenzer G. Risk savvy: how to make good decisions. New York, NY:
Viking / Penguin 2014.
- MacDonald C., Pinion SB, MacLeod UM. Scottish female obstetricians’
views on elective caesarean section and personal choice for delivery.J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 22: 586-9.
- Bergholt T, Østberg B, Legarth J, Weber T. Danish obstetricians’
personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section
on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey. Acta Obstet
Gynecol Scand 2004; 83: 262-266.
- Ouyang YQ, Zhang Q. A study on personal mode of delivery among Chinese
obstetrician-gynecologists, midwives and nurses. Arch Gynecol
Obstet 2013; 287: 37-41.
- Farrell SA, Baskett TF, Farrell KD. The choice of elective cesarean
delivery in obstetrics: a voluntary survey of Canadian health care
professionals. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2005; 16:
378-83.
- Turner CE, Young JM, Solomon MJ, Ludlow J, Benness C, Phippse H.
Vaginal delivery compared with elective caesarean section: the views
of pregnant women and clinicians. BJOG 2008; 115: 1494-502.
- Arikan, DC, Arikan DC, O¨zer A, Arikan I, Coskun A, Kiran H. Turkish
obstetricians’ personal preference for mode of delivery and attitude
toward cesarean delivery on maternal request. Arch Gynecol
Obstet 2011; 284: 543-549.
- Lightly K, Shaw E, Dailami N, Bisson D. Personal birth preferences and
actual mode of delivery outcomes of obstetricians and gynaecologists
in South West England; with comparison to regional and national birth
statistics. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014; 181: 95-98.
- Kovavisarach E, Ruttanapan K. Self-Preferred Route of Delivery of Thai
Obstetricians and Gynecologists. J Med Assoc Thai 2016; 99
Suppl 2: S84-90.
- Aref-Adib M, Vlachodimitropoulou E, Khasriya R, Lamb BW, Selo-Ojeme D.
UK O&G trainees’ attitudes to caesarean delivery for maternal
request. J Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 38: 367-371.
- Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The
Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and
National Estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS ONE 2016; 11: e0148343.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148343.
- Scheffer, M, Biancarelli A, Cassenote A. Demografia Médica no Brasil
2015. Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina da
USP. Conselho Regional de Medicina do Estado de São Paulo. Conselho
Federal de Medicina. São Paulo: 2015.
- Ferrari J, Lima NM. Atitudes dos profissionais de obstetrícia em
relação à escolha da via de parto em Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brasil.Rev Bioét 2010; 18: 645-658.
- Rivo JC, Amyx M, Pingray V, Casale RA, Fiorillo AE, Krupitzki HB,
Malamud JD, Mendilaharzu M, Medina ML, del Pino AB, Ribola L,
Schvartzman JA, Tartalo GM, Trasmonte M, Varela S, Althabe F, Belizan
JM. Obstetrical providers’ preferred mode of delivery and attitude
towards non-medically indicated caesarean sections: a cross-sectional
study. BJOG 2018; 125: 1294–1302.
- Gabbe SG, Holzman GB. Obstetricians’ choice of delivery. Lancet2001; 357: 722.
- Hantoushzadeh S, Rajabzadeh A, Saadati A, Mahdanian A, AshraWnia N,
Khazardoost S, Borna S, Maleki M, Shariat M. Cesarean or normal
vaginal delivery: overview of physicians’ self-preference and
suggestion to patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009; 280: 33-37.
- Gonen R, Tamir A, Degani S. Obstetricians’ opinions regarding patient
choice in cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 577-80.
- Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk NM. Survey of obstetricians’ personal
preference and discretionary practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol
Reprod Biol 1997; 73: 1-4.
- van der Does J, van Roosmalen J. Obstetricians’ choice of delivery.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001; 99: 139.
- Backe B, Salvesen KA, Sviggum O. Norwegian obstetricians prefer
vaginal route of delivery. Lancet 2002; 359: 629.
- Jacquemyn Y, Ahankour F, Martens G. Flemish obstetricians’ personal
preference regarding mode of delivery and attitude towards caesarean
section on demand. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003; 111:
164-6.
- Wax JR, Cartin A, Pinette MG, and Blackstone J. Patient choice
cesarean-the Maine experience. Birth 2005; 32: 203-6.
- Mc Gurgan P, Coulter-Smith S, O‘Donovan PJ. A national confidential
survey of obstetrician’s personal preferences regarding mode of
delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001 ; 97: 17-19.
- Lataifeh I, Zayed F, Al-Kuran O, Al-Mehaisen L, Khriesat W, Khader Y.
Jordanian obstetricians’ personal preference regarding mode of
delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009; 88: 733-6.
- Pinker S. The blank slate – the modern denial of human nature.
London: Peguin Books 2002.
- Pinker S. How the mind works. London: Peguin Books 1997.
- Ness RM, Williams GC. How we get sick – the new science of Darwinian
medicine. New York: Vintage Books 1996.
- Nesse RM. Good reasons for bad feelings - Insights from the frontiers
of evolutionary psychology. New York: Dutton / Penguin 2019.
- Finsen V, Storeheier AH, Aasland OG. Cesarean section - Norwegian
women do as obstetricians do, not as obstetricians say. Birth2008; 35: 117-120.
Table 1) Demographic characteristics of the obstetricians who
participated in the survey, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil