References
1. Jin YM, Liu SS, Chen J, Chen YN, Ren CC. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0193033.
2. Zhang SS, Ding T, Cui ZH, Lv Y, Jiang RA. Efficacy of robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with that of open and laparoscopic surgery: A separate meta-analysis of high-quality studies. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jan;98(4):e14171.
3. Shazly SA, Murad MH, Dowdy SC, Gostout BS, Famuyide AO. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Aug;138(2):457-71.
4. Piedimonte S, Czuzoj-Shulman N, Gotlieb W, Abenhaim HA. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 2019/03/01/;26(3):551-7.
5. Hoogendam JP, Verheijen RH, Wegner I, Zweemer RP. Oncological outcome and long-term complications in robot-assisted radical surgery for early stage cervical cancer: an observational cohort study. BJOG. 2014 Nov;121(12):1538-45.
6. Shah CA, Beck T, Liao JB, Giannakopoulos NV, Veljovich D, Paley P. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(6).
7. Sert BM, Boggess JF, Ahmad S, Jackson AL, Stavitzski NM, Dahl AA, et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: A multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Apr;42(4):513-22.
8. Mendivil AA, Rettenmaier MA, Abaid LN, Brown JV, 3rd, Micha JP, Lopez KL, et al. Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A five year experience. Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;25(1):66-71.
9. Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R, et al. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1895-904.
10. Melamed A, Margul DJ, Chen L, Keating NL, Del Carmen MG, Yang J, et al. Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1905-14.
11. Cusimano MC, Baxter NN, Gien LT, Moineddin R, Liu N, Dossa F, et al. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul 6.
12. Uppal S, Gehrig P, Vetter MH, Davidson BA, Lees BF, Brunette LL, et al. Recurrence rates in cervical cancer patients treated with abdominal versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: A multi-institutional analysis of 700 cases. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2019;37(15_suppl):5504.
13. National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS). NCRAS cervical cancer radical hysterectomy analysis May 2019 final [Internet]. 2019 May 15 [cited 2020 Jan 27]; Available from: https://www.bgcs.org.uk/ncras-cervical-cancer-radical-hysterectomy-analysis/
14. Alfonzo E, Wallin E, Ekdahl L, Staf C, Radestad AF, Reynisson P, et al. No survival difference between robotic and open radical hysterectomy for women with early-stage cervical cancer: results from a nationwide population-based cohort study. Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jul;116:169-77.
15. Matanes E, Abitbol J, Kessous R, Kogan L, Octeau D, Lau S, et al. Oncologic and Surgical Outcomes of Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Apr;41(4):450-8.
16. Chen L, Liu LP, Wen N, Qiao X, Meng YG. Comparative analysis of robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. World J Clin Cases. 2019 Oct 26;7(20):3185-93.
17. Yim GW, Kim SW, Nam EJ, Kim S, Kim YT. Learning curve analysis of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: initial experience at a single institution. J Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Oct;24(4):303-12.
18. Schreuder HW, Zweemer RP, van Baal WM, van de Lande J, Dijkstra JC, Verheijen RH. From open radical hysterectomy to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: aspects of a single institution learning curve. Gynecol Surg. 2010 Sep;7(3):253-8.
19. Heo YJ, Kim S, Min KJ, Lee S, Hong JH, Lee JK, et al. The comparison of surgical outcomes and learning curves of radical hysterectomy by laparoscopy and robotic system for cervical cancer: an experience of a single surgeon. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018 Jul;61(4):468-76.
20. Schreuder HW, Wolswijk R, Zweemer RP, Schijven MP, Verheijen RH. Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review. BJOG. 2012 Jan;119(2):137-49.
21. Abboudi H, Khan MS, Guru KA, Froghi S, de Win G, Van Poppel H, et al. Learning curves for urological procedures: a systematic review. BJU Int. 2014 Oct;114(4):617-29.
22. Doumerc N, Yuen C, Savdie R, Rahman MB, Rasiah KK, Pe Benito R, et al. Should experienced open prostatic surgeons convert to robotic surgery? The real learning curve for one surgeon over 3 years. BJU Int. 2010 Aug;106(3):378-84.
23. Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 May;105(2):103-4.
24. Hoogendam JP, Hobbelink MG, Veldhuis WB, Verheijen RH, van Diest PJ, Zweemer RP. Preoperative sentinel node mapping with (99m)Tc-nanocolloid SPECT-CT significantly reduces the intraoperative sentinel node retrieval time in robot assisted laparoscopic cervical cancer surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 May;129(2):389-94.
25. Steiner SH, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Treasure T. Monitoring surgical performance using risk-adjusted cumulative sum charts. Biostatistics. 2000 Dec;1(4):441-52.
26. Bolsin S, Colson M. The use of the Cusum technique in the assessment of trainee competence in new procedures. Int J Qual Health Care. 2000 Oct;12(5):433-8.
27. Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR, Dusek L, Zikan M, Zaal A, Sevcik L, et al. Prognostic significance of low volume sentinel lymph node disease in early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Mar;124(3):496-501.
28. Parisi A, Scrucca L, Desiderio J, Gemini A, Guarino S, Ricci F, et al. Robotic right hemicolectomy: Analysis of 108 consecutive procedures and multidimensional assessment of the learning curve. Surg Oncol. 2017 Mar;26(1):28-36.
29. Wenzel H, Smolders R, Beltman J, Lambrechts S, Trum H, Yigit R, et al. EP434 Survival of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after abdominal or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the Netherlands. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019;29(Suppl 4):A280-A1.
30. Steiner SH, Woodall WH. Debate: what is the best method to monitor surgical performance? BMC Surg. 2016 Apr 5;16:15.
31. van Zanten F, Schraffordt Koops SE, Pasker-de Jong PCM, Lenters E, Schreuder HWR. Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpo(recto)pexy: a cumulative sum analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May 29.
32. Liu Y, Li L, Wu M, Ma S, Tan X, Zhong S, et al. The impact of the surgical routes and learning curve of radical hysterectomy on the survival outcomes in stage IB cervical cancer: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2019 Aug;68:72-7.
33. Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadiere GB, Nyssen AS. Comparison of learning curves and skill transfer between classical and robotic laparoscopy according to the viewing conditions: implications for training. Am J Surg. 2007 Jul;194(1):115-21.
34. Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL, Carlson MJ, Valmadre S, Phillips GS, et al. A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Aug;114(2):162-7.
35. Chong GO, Lee YH, Lee HJ, Hong DG, Lee YS. Comparison of the Long-Term Oncological Outcomes Between the Initial Learning Period of Robotic and the Experienced Period of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 Feb;28(2):226-32.
36. Zaal A, Zweemer RP, Zikan M, Dusek L, Querleu D, Lecuru F, et al. Pelvic lymphadenectomy improves survival in patients with cervical cancer with low-volume disease in the sentinel node: a retrospective multicenter cohort study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Feb;24(2):303-11.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the two groups divided by the learning curve analysis.