References
1. De Geyter C, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka MS, Wyns C, Mocanu E, Motrenko T, et al. ART in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries by ESHRE: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), 2018. Human reproduction 2018;33: 1586-601.
2. Veltman-Verhulst SM, Hughes E, Ayeleke RO, Cohlen BJ. Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility, 2016. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2016;19: 2 (CD001838-CD).
3. Cohlen B, Bijkerk A, Van der Poel S, Ombelet W. IUI: review and systematic assessment of the evidence that supports global recommendations, 2018. Human reproduction update 2018;24:300-19.
4. Group EC W. Intrauterine insemination, 2009. Human reproduction update 2009;15:265-77.
5. Plosker SM, Jacobson W, Amato P. Predicting and optimizing success in an intra-uterine insemination programme, 1994. Human reproduction 1994;9: 2014-21.
6. Ragni G, Somigliana E, Vegetti W. Timing of intrauterine insemination: where are we? 2004. Fertility and sterility 2004;82:25-35.
7. Evans J, Salamonsen LA. Too much of a good thing? Experimental evidence suggests prolonged exposure to hCG is detrimental to endometrial receptivity, 2013. Human reproduction 2013;28:1610-9.
8. Ezoe K, Daikoku T, Yabuuchi A, Murata N, Kawano H, Abe T, et al. Ovarian stimulation using human chorionic gonadotrophin impairs blastocyst implantation and decidualization by altering ovarian hormone levels and downstream signaling in mice, 2014. Molecular human reproduction 2014;20:1101-16.
9. Kyrou D, Kolibianakis EM, Fatemi HM, Grimbizis GF, Theodoridis TD, Camus M, et al. Spontaneous triggering of ovulation versus HCG administration in patients undergoing IUI: a prospective randomized study, 2012. Reproductive biomedicine online 2012;25:278-83.
10. Kosmas IP, Tatsioni A, Fatemi HM, Kolibianakis EM, Tournaye H, Devroey P. Human chorionic gonadotropin administration vs. luteinizing monitoring for intrauterine insemination timing, after administration of clomiphene citrate: a meta-analysis, 2007. Fertility and sterility 2007;87:607-12.
11. El Hachem H, Antaki R, Sylvestre C, Lapensee L, Legendre G, Bouet PE. Timing therapeutic donor inseminations in natural cycles: human chorionic gonadotrophin administration versus urinary LH monitoring, 2017. Reproductive biomedicine online 2017;35:174-9.
12. Martinez AR, Bernadus RE, Voorhorst FJ, Vermeiden JP, Schoemaker J. A controlled study of human chorionic gonadotrophin induced ovulation versus urinary luteinizing hormone surge for timing of intrauterine insemination, 1991. Human reproduction (Oxford, England) 1991;6:1247-51.
13. Mohamad E. Ghanem N, Bakre, Mohamad A. Emam, Laila A. The effects of timing of intrauterine insemination in relation to ovulation and the number of inseminations on cycle pregnancy rate in common infertility etiologies, 2011. Human reproduction 2011. 26, 576-83
14. Rijsdijk OE, Cantineau AE, Bourdrez P, Gijsen TP, Gondrie ET, Sprengers O, et al. Intrauterine insemination: simultaneous with or 36 h after HCG? A randomized clinical trial, 2019. Reproductive biomedicine online 2019;39, 262-268
15. Blockeel C, Knez J, Polyzos NP, De Vos M, Camus M, Tournaye H. Should an intrauterine insemination with donor semen be performed 1 or 2 days after the spontaneous LH rise? 2014. A prospective RCT. Human reproduction 2014; 29:697 -703.
16. Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Baker HW, Behre HM, et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics, 2010. Hum Reprod Update 2010; 16:231–45.
17. Zarek SM, Hill MJ, Richter KS, Wu M, DeCherney AH, Osheroff JE, et al. Single-donor and double-donor sperm intrauterine insemination cycles: does double intrauterine insemination increase clinical pregnancy rates? 2014. Fertility and sterility 2014;102:739-43.
18. Iberico G, Vioque J, Ariza N, Lozano JM, Roca M, Llacer J, et al. Analysis of factors influencing pregnancy rates in homologous intrauterine insemination, 2004. Fertility and sterility 2004;81(5):1308-13.
19. Thijssen A, Creemers A, Van der Elst W, Creemers E, Vandormael E, Dhont N, et al. Predictive factors influencing pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination with frozen donor semen: a prospective cohort study, 2017. Reproductive biomedicine online 2017;34:590-7.
20. ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Intrauterine insemination, 2009. Hum Reprod Update 2009; 15:265-77.
21. Arab-Zozani, M. and C. O. Nastri. Single versus double intrauterine insemination (IUI) for pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2017. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017; 215: 75-84.
22. Taerk E, Hughes E, Greenberg C, Neal M, Amin S, Faghih M, et al. Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation with Intrauterine Insemination Is More Successful After r-hCG Administration Than Spontaneous LH Surge, 2017. Journal of reproduction & infertility 2017;18:316-22.
23. Mitwally MF, Abdel-Razeq S, Casper RF. Human chorionic gonadotropin administration is associated with high pregnancy rates during ovarian stimulation and timed intercourse or intrauterine insemination, 2004. Reproductive biology and endocrinology 2004;2:55.
24. Jarvela IY, Tapanainen JS, Martikainen H. Improved pregnancy rate with administration of hCG after intrauterine insemination: a pilot study, 2010. Reproductive biology and endocrinology 2010;8:18.
25. Cantineau AE, Janssen MJ, Cohlen BJ , Allersma T. Synchronised approach for intrauterine insemination in subfertile couples, 2014. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2014:Cd006942.
26. Miller PB, Soules MR. The usefulness of a urinary LH kit for ovulation prediction during menstrual cycles of normal women, 1996. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87:13-7.d
27. Lemmens L, Kos S, Beijer C, Braat DDM, Nelen WLDM, Wetzels AMM. Techniques used for IUI: is it time for a change ? 2017. Hum Reprod 2017;32:1835-45.