Cycle Characteristics and Reproductive Outcomes of FET
The Cycle Characteristics and reproductive Outcomes of FET are presented
in Table 2. Endometrial thickness and its increase are significantly
greater in TAM group (8.98±2.02vs8.15±1.11, 2.82±2.21 vs2.2±1.59).
Nonetheless, the duration of endometrium preparation was shorter in TAM
group than HRT group. The distribution of best embryos transfer was
comparable between the two groups (p=0.481).The clinical pregnancy rate,
implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and live birth rate were
significantly higher in TAM group than HRT group. The miscarriage rate
was similar between the two groups (11.8% vs.14.0%; p=0.701).
After adjusting the results for the above-mentioned potential
confounders (Table 3), the CPRs, OPRs and LBRs remained consistently
higher [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 95% CI] in TAM group compared
with HRT group[CPR(aOR1.820, 95% CI1.219-2.72), OPRs(aOR1.640, 95%
CI1.090-2.467) LBRs(aOR1.570, 95% CI1.018-2.420)].