Statical Analysis:
The evaluation of the uterine cavity was decided with “consensus rate”. The consensus rate is described as the average of different analysts’ estimates. In our study, we calculated consensus rate for normality or the uterus with the mean rating of Figure 1 (Normal uterine cavity) (n:103). As the result, it was found to be 60 percent, and the HSG images with >6 votes for Figure-1 were accepted as normal uterine cavity.
Distribution of data was assessed with histograms. Depending on distribution characteristics, continuous variables were defined with mean (standard deviation) or median (25th and 75th percentiles). Categorical variables were defined as percentages. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Student T test, Mann Whitney U test or chi-square test and its derivatives were used for between group comparisons. A two tailed p value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Spearman and Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine any correlation between variable.
Ethical Considerations :
The study was approved by local ethics committee with the approval number 2020-1/18.