Statical Analysis:
The evaluation of the uterine cavity was decided with “consensus
rate”. The consensus rate is described as the average of different
analysts’ estimates. In our study, we calculated consensus rate for
normality or the uterus with the mean rating of Figure 1 (Normal uterine
cavity) (n:103). As the result, it was found to be 60 percent, and the
HSG images with >6 votes for Figure-1 were accepted
as normal uterine cavity.
Distribution of data was assessed with histograms. Depending on
distribution characteristics, continuous variables were defined with
mean (standard deviation) or median (25th and
75th percentiles). Categorical variables were defined
as percentages. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Student T test,
Mann Whitney U test or chi-square test and its derivatives were used for
between group comparisons. A two tailed p value < 0.05 was
considered as statistically significant. Spearman and Pearson
correlation analysis was used to determine any correlation between
variable.
Ethical Considerations :
The study was approved by local ethics committee with the approval
number 2020-1/18.