References
1. Misdan N, Lau WJ, Ismail AF. Seawater Reverse Osmosis (SWRO) desalination by thin-film composite membrane-Current development, challenges and future prospects. Desalination. 2012;287:228-237.
2. Yip NY, Tiraferri A, Phillip WA, Schiffman JD, Elimelech M. High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane.Environmental Science and Technology. 2010;44(10):3812-3818.
3. Yang Z, Guo H, Tang CY. The upper bound of thin-film composite (TFC) polyamide membranes for desalination. Journal of Membrane Science. 2019;590.
4. Cadotte JE, Petersen RJ, Larson RE, Erickson EE. A new thin-film composite seawater reverse osmosis membrane.Desalination. 1980;32:25-31.
5. Ismail AF, Padaki M, Hilal N, Matsuura T, Lau WJ. Thin film composite membrane - Recent development and future potential.Desalination. 2015;356:140-148.
6. Li X, Li Q, Fang W, Wang R, Krantz WB. Effects of the support on the characteristics and permselectivity of thin film composite membranes. Journal of Membrane Science. 2019;580:12-23.
7. Rao AP, Joshi SV, Trivedi JJ, Devmurari CV, Shah VJ. Structure-performance correlation of polyamide thin film composite membranes: Effect of coating conditions on film formation. Journal of Membrane Science. 2003;211(1):13-24.
8. Ghosh AK, Hoek EMV. Impacts of support membrane structure and chemistry on polyamide-polysulfone interfacial composite membranes.Journal of Membrane Science. Jul 2009;336(1-2):140-148.
9. Singh PS, Joshi SV, Trivedi JJ, Devmurari CV, Rao AP, Ghosh PK. Probing the structural variations of thin film composite RO membranes obtained by coating polyamide over polysulfone membranes of different pore dimensions. Journal of Membrane Science.2006;278(1-2):19-25.
10. ElSherbiny IMA, Ghannam R, Khalil ASG, Ulbricht M. Isotropic macroporous polyethersulfone membranes as competitive supports for high performance polyamide desalination membranes. Journal of Membrane Science. 2015;493:782-793.
11. Alsvik IL, Hagg MB. Preparation of thin film composite membranes with polyamide film on hydrophilic supports. Journal of Membrane Science. Feb 2013;428:225-231.
12. Zhang Q, Zhang Z, Dai L, Wang H, Li S, Zhang S. Novel insights into the interplay between support and active layer in the thin film composite polyamide membranes. Journal of Membrane Science.2017;537:372-383.
13. Kim HI, Kim SS. Plasma treatment of polypropylene and polysulfone supports for thin film composite reverse osmosis membrane.Journal of Membrane Science. 2006;286(1-2):193-201.
14. Kim ES, Kim YJ, Yu Q, Deng B. Preparation and characterization of polyamide thin-film composite (TFC) membranes on plasma-modified polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF). Journal of Membrane Science. 2009;344(1-2):71-81.
15. Jimenez-Solomon MF, Gorgojo P, Munoz-Ibanez M, Livingston AG. Beneath the surface: Influence of supports on thin film composite membranes by interfacial polymerization for organic solvent nanofiltration. Journal of Membrane Science. 2013;448:102-113.
16. Ding C, Yin J, Deng B. Effects of Polysulfone (PSf) Support Layer on the Performance of Thin-Film Composite (TFC) Membranes.Journal of Chemical and Process Engineering. 08/02 2013;1.
17. McCutcheon JR, Elimelech M. Influence of membrane support layer hydrophobicity on water flux in osmotically driven membrane processes. Journal of Membrane Science. 2008;318(1-2):458-466.
18. Wang YN, Goh K, Li X, Setiawan L, Wang R. Membranes and processes for forward osmosis-based desalination: Recent advances and future prospects. Desalination. 2018;434:81-99.
19. McCutcheon JR. Avoiding the Hype in Developing Commercially Viable Desalination Technologies. Joule. 2019;3(5):1168-1171.
20. Lay WCL, Zhang Q, Zhang J, et al. Effect of Pharmaceuticals on the Performance of a Novel Osmotic Membrane Bioreactor (OMBR).Separation Science and Technology. 2012;47(4):543-554.
21. Garcia-Castello EM, McCutcheon JR. Dewatering press liquor derived from orange production by forward osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science. 2011;372(1-2):97-101.
22. Cath TY, Childress AE, Elimelech M. Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments. Journal of Membrane Science. 2006;281(1):70-87.
23. Zhao S, Zou L, Tang CY, Mulcahy D. Recent developments in forward osmosis: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Membrane Science. 2012;396:1-21.
24. Logan BE, Elimelech M. Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water. Nature.2012;488(7411):313-319.
25. Choi W, Jeon S, Kwon SJ, et al. Thin film composite reverse osmosis membranes prepared via layered interfacial polymerization.Journal of Membrane Science. Apr 2017;527:121-128.
26. Park SJ, Kwon SJ, Kwon HE, et al. Aromatic solvent-assisted interfacial polymerization to prepare high performance thin film composite reverse osmosis membranes based on hydrophilic supports.Polymer. 2018;144:159-167.
27. Kwon HE, Kwon SJ, Park SJ, et al. High performance polyacrylonitrile-supported forward osmosis membranes prepared via aromatic solvent-based interfacial polymerization. Separation and Purification Technology. 2019;212:449-457.
28. Ishigami T, Amano K, Fujii A, et al. Fouling reduction of reverse osmosis membrane by surface modification via layer-by-layer assembly. Separation and Purification Technology. 2012;99:1-7.
29. Xu G-R, Wang S-H, Zhao H-L, et al. Layer-by-layer (LBL) assembly technology as promising strategy for tailoring pressure-driven desalination membranes. Journal of Membrane Science.2015;493:428-443.
30. Qi S, Li Y, Zhao Y, Li W, Tang CY. Highly Efficient Forward Osmosis Based on Porous Membranes—Applications and Implications.Environmental Science & Technology. 2015;49(7):4690-4695.
31. Liu X, Qi S, Li Y, Yang L, Cao B, Tang CY. Synthesis and characterization of novel antibacterial silver nanocomposite nanofiltration and forward osmosis membranes based on layer-by-layer assembly. Water Research. 2013;47(9):3081-3092.
32. Liu X, Foo LX, Li Y, Lee JY, Cao B, Tang CY. Fabrication and characterization of nanocomposite pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) membranes with excellent anti-biofouling property and enhanced water permeability. Desalination. 2016;389:137-148.
33. Wang ZG, Wan LS, Xu ZK. Surface engineerings of polyacrylonitrile-based asymmetric membranes towards biomedical applications: An overview. Journal of Membrane Science.2007;304(1-2):8-23.
34. Strathmann H, Kock K. The formation mechanism of phase inversion membranes. Desalination. 1977;21(3):241-255.
35. Suwaileh W, Johnson D, Khodabakhshi S, Hilal N. Development of forward osmosis membranes modified by cross-linked layer by layer assembly for brackish water desalination. Journal of Membrane Science. 2019;583:267-277.
36. Duong PHH, Zuo J, Chung TS. Highly crosslinked layer-by-layer polyelectrolyte FO membranes: Understanding effects of salt concentration and deposition time on FO performance. Journal of Membrane Science. 2013;427:411-421.
37. Shimanovich DL, Vorobjova AI, Tishkevich DI, Trukhanov AV, Zdorovets MV, Kozlovskiy AL. Preparation and morphology-dependent wettability of porous alumina membranes. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology. 2018;9:1423-1436.
38. Lohokare H, Bhole Y, Taralkar S, Kharul U. Poly(acrylonitrile) based ultrafiltration membranes: Optimization of preparation parameters. Desalination. 2011;282:46-53.
39. Lai CL, Chao WC, Hung WS, et al. Physicochemical effects of hydrolyzed asymmetric polyacrylonitrile membrane microstructure on dehydrating butanol. Journal of Membrane Science.2015;490:275-281.
40. Ma X, Yang Z, Yao Z, Guo H, Xu Z, Tang CY. Tuning roughness features of thin film composite polyamide membranes for simultaneously enhanced permeability, selectivity and anti-fouling performance.Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2019;540:382-388.
41. Chai GY, Krantz WB. Formation and characterization of polyamide membranes via interfacial polymerization. Journal of Membrane Science. 1994;93(2):175-192.
42. Kolasinska M, Warszynski P. The effect of support material and conditioning on wettability of PAH/PSS multilayer films.Bioelectrochemistry. Apr 2005;66(1-2):65-70.
43. Khare VP, Greenberg AR, Krantz WB. Development of pendant drop mechanical analysis as a technique for determining the stress-relaxation and water-permeation properties of interfacially polymerized barrier layers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. Dec 2003;90(10):2618-2628.
44. Freger V, Srebnik S. Mathematical model of charge and density distributions in interfacial polymerization of thin films.J. Appl. Polym. Sci. May 2003;88(5):1162-1169.
45. Tang CY, She Q, Lay WCL, Wang R, Fane AG. Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration. Journal of Membrane Science. 2010;354(1-2):123-133.
46. McCutcheon JR, Elimelech M. Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science. 2006;284(1):237-247.
47. Li Z, Liu X, Chen G, Deng BL, Li WY. Effects of membrane morphology on the rejection of oil droplets: Theoretical analysis based on network modeling. Journal of Membrane Science. Oct 2019;588.
48. Li W, Gao Y, Tang CY. Network modeling for studying the effect of support structure on internal concentration polarization during forward osmosis: Model development and theoretical analysis with FEM. Journal of Membrane Science. 2011;379(1-2):307-321.