References
1. Misdan N, Lau WJ, Ismail AF. Seawater Reverse Osmosis (SWRO)
desalination by thin-film composite membrane-Current development,
challenges and future prospects. Desalination. 2012;287:228-237.
2. Yip NY, Tiraferri A, Phillip WA, Schiffman JD, Elimelech M.
High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane.Environmental Science and Technology. 2010;44(10):3812-3818.
3. Yang Z, Guo H, Tang CY. The upper bound of thin-film
composite (TFC) polyamide membranes for desalination. Journal of
Membrane Science. 2019;590.
4. Cadotte JE, Petersen RJ, Larson RE, Erickson EE. A new
thin-film composite seawater reverse osmosis membrane.Desalination. 1980;32:25-31.
5. Ismail AF, Padaki M, Hilal N, Matsuura T, Lau WJ. Thin film
composite membrane - Recent development and future potential.Desalination. 2015;356:140-148.
6. Li X, Li Q, Fang W, Wang R, Krantz WB. Effects of the
support on the characteristics and permselectivity of thin film
composite membranes. Journal of Membrane Science. 2019;580:12-23.
7. Rao AP, Joshi SV, Trivedi JJ, Devmurari CV, Shah VJ.
Structure-performance correlation of polyamide thin film composite
membranes: Effect of coating conditions on film formation. Journal
of Membrane Science. 2003;211(1):13-24.
8. Ghosh AK, Hoek EMV. Impacts of support membrane structure
and chemistry on polyamide-polysulfone interfacial composite membranes.Journal of Membrane Science. Jul 2009;336(1-2):140-148.
9. Singh PS, Joshi SV, Trivedi JJ, Devmurari CV, Rao AP, Ghosh
PK. Probing the structural variations of thin film composite RO
membranes obtained by coating polyamide over polysulfone membranes of
different pore dimensions. Journal of Membrane Science.2006;278(1-2):19-25.
10. ElSherbiny IMA, Ghannam R, Khalil ASG, Ulbricht M.
Isotropic macroporous polyethersulfone membranes as competitive supports
for high performance polyamide desalination membranes. Journal of
Membrane Science. 2015;493:782-793.
11. Alsvik IL, Hagg MB. Preparation of thin film composite
membranes with polyamide film on hydrophilic supports. Journal of
Membrane Science. Feb 2013;428:225-231.
12. Zhang Q, Zhang Z, Dai L, Wang H, Li S, Zhang S. Novel
insights into the interplay between support and active layer in the thin
film composite polyamide membranes. Journal of Membrane Science.2017;537:372-383.
13. Kim HI, Kim SS. Plasma treatment of polypropylene and
polysulfone supports for thin film composite reverse osmosis membrane.Journal of Membrane Science. 2006;286(1-2):193-201.
14. Kim ES, Kim YJ, Yu Q, Deng B. Preparation and
characterization of polyamide thin-film composite (TFC) membranes on
plasma-modified polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF). Journal of
Membrane Science. 2009;344(1-2):71-81.
15. Jimenez-Solomon MF, Gorgojo P, Munoz-Ibanez M, Livingston
AG. Beneath the surface: Influence of supports on thin film composite
membranes by interfacial polymerization for organic solvent
nanofiltration. Journal of Membrane Science. 2013;448:102-113.
16. Ding C, Yin J, Deng B. Effects of Polysulfone (PSf) Support
Layer on the Performance of Thin-Film Composite (TFC) Membranes.Journal of Chemical and Process Engineering. 08/02 2013;1.
17. McCutcheon JR, Elimelech M. Influence of membrane support
layer hydrophobicity on water flux in osmotically driven membrane
processes. Journal of Membrane Science. 2008;318(1-2):458-466.
18. Wang YN, Goh K, Li X, Setiawan L, Wang R. Membranes and
processes for forward osmosis-based desalination: Recent advances and
future prospects. Desalination. 2018;434:81-99.
19. McCutcheon JR. Avoiding the Hype in Developing Commercially
Viable Desalination Technologies. Joule. 2019;3(5):1168-1171.
20. Lay WCL, Zhang Q, Zhang J, et al. Effect of Pharmaceuticals
on the Performance of a Novel Osmotic Membrane Bioreactor (OMBR).Separation Science and Technology. 2012;47(4):543-554.
21. Garcia-Castello EM, McCutcheon JR. Dewatering press liquor
derived from orange production by forward osmosis. Journal of
Membrane Science. 2011;372(1-2):97-101.
22. Cath TY, Childress AE, Elimelech M. Forward osmosis:
Principles, applications, and recent developments. Journal of
Membrane Science. 2006;281(1):70-87.
23. Zhao S, Zou L, Tang CY, Mulcahy D. Recent developments in
forward osmosis: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Membrane
Science. 2012;396:1-21.
24. Logan BE, Elimelech M. Membrane-based processes for
sustainable power generation using water. Nature.2012;488(7411):313-319.
25. Choi W, Jeon S, Kwon SJ, et al. Thin film composite reverse
osmosis membranes prepared via layered interfacial polymerization.Journal of Membrane Science. Apr 2017;527:121-128.
26. Park SJ, Kwon SJ, Kwon HE, et al. Aromatic solvent-assisted
interfacial polymerization to prepare high performance thin film
composite reverse osmosis membranes based on hydrophilic supports.Polymer. 2018;144:159-167.
27. Kwon HE, Kwon SJ, Park SJ, et al. High performance
polyacrylonitrile-supported forward osmosis membranes prepared via
aromatic solvent-based interfacial polymerization. Separation and
Purification Technology. 2019;212:449-457.
28. Ishigami T, Amano K, Fujii A, et al. Fouling reduction of
reverse osmosis membrane by surface modification via layer-by-layer
assembly. Separation and Purification Technology. 2012;99:1-7.
29. Xu G-R, Wang S-H, Zhao H-L, et al. Layer-by-layer (LBL)
assembly technology as promising strategy for tailoring pressure-driven
desalination membranes. Journal of Membrane Science.2015;493:428-443.
30. Qi S, Li Y, Zhao Y, Li W, Tang CY. Highly Efficient Forward
Osmosis Based on Porous Membranes—Applications and Implications.Environmental Science & Technology. 2015;49(7):4690-4695.
31. Liu X, Qi S, Li Y, Yang L, Cao B, Tang CY. Synthesis and
characterization of novel antibacterial silver nanocomposite
nanofiltration and forward osmosis membranes based on layer-by-layer
assembly. Water Research. 2013;47(9):3081-3092.
32. Liu X, Foo LX, Li Y, Lee JY, Cao B, Tang CY. Fabrication
and characterization of nanocomposite pressure retarded osmosis (PRO)
membranes with excellent anti-biofouling property and enhanced water
permeability. Desalination. 2016;389:137-148.
33. Wang ZG, Wan LS, Xu ZK. Surface engineerings of
polyacrylonitrile-based asymmetric membranes towards biomedical
applications: An overview. Journal of Membrane Science.2007;304(1-2):8-23.
34. Strathmann H, Kock K. The formation mechanism of phase
inversion membranes. Desalination. 1977;21(3):241-255.
35. Suwaileh W, Johnson D, Khodabakhshi S, Hilal N. Development
of forward osmosis membranes modified by cross-linked layer by layer
assembly for brackish water desalination. Journal of Membrane
Science. 2019;583:267-277.
36. Duong PHH, Zuo J, Chung TS. Highly crosslinked
layer-by-layer polyelectrolyte FO membranes: Understanding effects of
salt concentration and deposition time on FO performance. Journal
of Membrane Science. 2013;427:411-421.
37. Shimanovich DL, Vorobjova AI, Tishkevich DI, Trukhanov AV,
Zdorovets MV, Kozlovskiy AL. Preparation and morphology-dependent
wettability of porous alumina membranes. Beilstein Journal of
Nanotechnology. 2018;9:1423-1436.
38. Lohokare H, Bhole Y, Taralkar S, Kharul U.
Poly(acrylonitrile) based ultrafiltration membranes: Optimization of
preparation parameters. Desalination. 2011;282:46-53.
39. Lai CL, Chao WC, Hung WS, et al. Physicochemical effects of
hydrolyzed asymmetric polyacrylonitrile membrane microstructure on
dehydrating butanol. Journal of Membrane Science.2015;490:275-281.
40. Ma X, Yang Z, Yao Z, Guo H, Xu Z, Tang CY. Tuning roughness
features of thin film composite polyamide membranes for simultaneously
enhanced permeability, selectivity and anti-fouling performance.Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2019;540:382-388.
41. Chai GY, Krantz WB. Formation and characterization of
polyamide membranes via interfacial polymerization. Journal of
Membrane Science. 1994;93(2):175-192.
42. Kolasinska M, Warszynski P. The effect of support material
and conditioning on wettability of PAH/PSS multilayer films.Bioelectrochemistry. Apr 2005;66(1-2):65-70.
43. Khare VP, Greenberg AR, Krantz WB. Development of pendant
drop mechanical analysis as a technique for determining the
stress-relaxation and water-permeation properties of interfacially
polymerized barrier layers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. Dec
2003;90(10):2618-2628.
44. Freger V, Srebnik S. Mathematical model of charge and
density distributions in interfacial polymerization of thin films.J. Appl. Polym. Sci. May 2003;88(5):1162-1169.
45. Tang CY, She Q, Lay WCL, Wang R, Fane AG. Coupled effects
of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of
forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration. Journal of
Membrane Science. 2010;354(1-2):123-133.
46. McCutcheon JR, Elimelech M. Influence of concentrative and
dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward
osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science. 2006;284(1):237-247.
47. Li Z, Liu X, Chen G, Deng BL, Li WY. Effects of membrane
morphology on the rejection of oil droplets: Theoretical analysis based
on network modeling. Journal of Membrane Science. Oct 2019;588.
48. Li W, Gao Y, Tang CY. Network modeling for studying the
effect of support structure on internal concentration polarization
during forward osmosis: Model development and theoretical analysis with
FEM. Journal of Membrane Science. 2011;379(1-2):307-321.