References
1. Bamberg C, Hinkson L, Henrich W. Cesarean scar niche and uterotomy
closure technique. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica.2018;97(5):630-630.
2. Stegwee SI, Jordans IPM, van der Voet LF, et al. Uterine caesarean
closure techniques affect ultrasound findings and maternal outcomes: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG: An International
Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2018;125(9):1097-1108.
3. Kremer TG, Ghiorzi IB, Dibi RP. Isthmocele: an overview of diagnosis
and treatment. Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. 2019;65(5):714-721.
4. Vervoort AJMW, Uittenbogaard LB, Hehenkamp WJK, Brölmann HAM, Mol
BWJ, Huirne JAF. Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars?
Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development. Hum. Reprod.2015:dev240.
5. Caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised factorial trial
(CAESAR)*. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics &
Gynaecology. 2010;117(11):1366-1376.
6. Holmgren G, Sjoholm L, Stark M. The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean
section: method description. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. Aug
1999;78(7):615-621.
7. Caesarean section surgical techniques: 3 year follow-up of the
CORONIS fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial.The Lancet. 2016;388(10039):62-72.
8. Bamberg C, Dudenhausen J, Bujak V, et al. A Prospective Randomized
Clinical Trial of Single vs. Double Layer Closure of Hysterotomy at the
Time of Cesarean Delivery: The Effect on Uterine Scar Thickness.Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound.2016;39(03):343-351.
9. Bamberg C, Hinkson L, Dudenhausen JW, Bujak V, Kalache KD, Henrich W.
Longitudinal transvaginal ultrasound evaluation of cesarean scar niche
incidence and depth in the first two years after single- or double-layer
uterotomy closure: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstetricia
et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2017;96(12):1484-1489.
10. Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saccone G, McCurdy R, Bujold E, Bifulco G,
Berghella V. Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs
double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of
randomized controlled trials. Ultrasound in Obstetrics &
Gynecology. 2017;50(5):578-583.
11. Roberge S, Chaillet N, Boutin A, et al. Single- versus double-layer
closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of
uterine rupture. International Journal of Gynecology &
Obstetrics. 2011;115(1):5-10.
12. Turan C, Büyükbayrak EE, Onan Yilmaz A, Karageyim Karsidag Y,
Pirimoglu M. Purse-string double-layer closure: A novel technique for
repairing the uterine incision during cesarean section. Journal of
Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2015;41(4):565-574.
13. Sholapurkar SL. Etiology of Cesarean Uterine Scar Defect (Niche):
Detailed Critical Analysis of Hypotheses and Prevention Strategies and
Peritoneal Closure Debate. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2018;10(3):166-173.
14. Roberge S, Demers S, Girard M, et al. Impact of uterine closure on
residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled
trial. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016;214(4):507.e501-507.e506.
15. Jelsema RD, Wittingen JA, Vander Kolk KJ. Continuous, nonlocking,
single-layer repair of the low transverse uterine incision. J.
Reprod. Med. May 1993;38(5):393-396.
16. Antila-Långsjö R, Mäenpää JU, Huhtala H, Tomás E, Staff S.
Comparison of transvaginal ultrasound and saline contrast
sonohysterography in evaluation of cesarean scar defect: a prospective
cohort study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica.2018;97(9):1130-1136.
17. Vikhareva Osser O, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. Cesarean section scar
defects: agreement between transvaginal sonographic findings with and
without saline contrast enhancement. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and
Gynecology. 2010;35(1):75-83.
18. Antila RM, Mäenpää JU, Huhtala HS, Tomás EI, Staff SM. Association
of cesarean scar defect with abnormal uterine bleeding: The results of a
prospective study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
and Reproductive Biology. 2020;244:134-140.
19. Tekiner NB, Çetin BA, Türkgeldi LS, Yılmaz G, Polat İ, Gedikbaşı A.
Evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer hysterotomy
closure: a prospective cross-sectional study. Arch. Gynecol.
Obstet. 2018;297(5):1137-1143.
20. Stegwee SI JI, van der Voet LF, Bongers MY, de Groot CJM, Lambalk
CB, et al. . The effect of single- versus double-layer closure of the
uterine caesarean scar on postmenstrual spotting: a multicentre,
double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Fact, Views & Vision.
Journal of the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy. 2019;11
(Supplement 1).