References
1. Frater RW, Furlong P, Cosgrove DM, Okies JE, Colburn LQ, Katz AS,
Lowe NL, Ryba EA. Long-term durability and patient functional status of
the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis in the aortic
position. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:48-53.
2. Kulik A, Bédard P, Lam BK, Rubens FD, Hendry PJ, Masters RG, Mesana
TG, Ruel M.Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in
middle-aged patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 30:485-491.
3. Chikwe J, Chiang YP, Egorova NN, Itagaki S, Adams DH. Survival and
outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical mitral valve replacement
in patients aged 50 to 69 years. JAMA2015; 313:1435-1442.
4. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Guyton
RA, O’Gara PT, Ruiz CE, Skubas NJ, Sorajja P, Sundt TM 3rd, Thomas JD;
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on
Practice Guidelines. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of
patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on
Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014; 129:2440-2492.
5. Wang Y, Chen S, Shi J, Li G, Dong N. Mid- to long-term outcome
comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic
valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a
propensity-matched analysis. Interact CardiovascThorac Surg 2015;
22:1–7.
6. Cunanan CM, Cabiling CM, Dinh TT, Shen SH, Tran-Hata P, Rutledge
JH 3rd, Fishbein MC. Tissue characterization and calcification potential
of commercial bioprosthetic heart valves. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;
71:417-421.
7. Kaneko T, Aranki S, Javed Q, McGurk S, Shekar P, Davidson M, Cohn L.
Mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in
patients<65 years old. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;
147:117-126.
8. Kyriacou DN, Lewis RJ. Confounding by indication in clinical
research. JAMA. 2016; 316:1818–1819.
9. Sordelli C, Severino S, Ascione L, Coppolino P, Caso
P. Echocardiographic assessment of heart valve prostheses. J Cardiovasc
Echogr2014; 24:103-113.
10. Castillo JG, Solís J, González-Pinto A, Adams DH. Surgical
echocardiography of the mitral valve. Rev Esp Cardiol 2011;
64:1169–1181.
11. Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the
subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 1999;94:496-509.
12. Tillquist MN, Maddox TM. Cardiac crossroads: deciding between
mechanical or bioprosthetic heart valve replacement. Patient
Prefer Adherence 2011; 5:91–99.
13. Fino C, Iacovoni A, Pibarot P, Pepper JR, Ferrero P, Merlo
M, Galletti L, Caputo M, Ferrazzi P, Anagnostopoulos C, Cugola D, Senni
M, Bellavia D, Magne J. Exercise hemodynamic and functional capacity
after mitral valve replacement in patients with ischemic mitral
regurgitation: a comparison of mechanical versus biological prostheses.
Circ Heart Fail 2018;11:e004056.
14. Iung B, Rodes-Cabau J. The optimal management of anti-thrombotic
therapy after valve replacement: certainties and uncertainties. Eur
Heart J 2014; 35:2942-2949.
15. Gammie JS, Sheng S, Griffith BP, Peterson ED, Rankin JS, O’Brien
SM, Brown JM. Trends in mitral valve surgery in the United
States: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac
Database. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87:1431-1439.
16. Woo YJ, Greene CL. Prosthetic valve choice in middle-aged
patients:guidelines and other guiding principles. Eur J Cardiothorac
Surg 2016; 49:1468-1469.
17. Rahimtoola SH. Choice of prosthetic heart valve in adults. Am Coll
Cardiol 2010; 55:2413–2426.
18. Hui C, Lili M, Libin C, Rui Z, Fang G, Ling G, Jianping Z. Changes
in coagulation and hemodynamics during pregnancy: a prospective
longitudinal study of 58 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 285:1231-1236.
19. Applegate PM, Boyd WD, Applegate li RL, Liu H. Is it the time to
reconsider the choice of valves for cardiac surgery: mechanical or
bioprosthetic? J Biomed Res 2017; 31:373–376.
20. Walfisch A, Koren G. The ”warfarin window” in pregnancy: the
importance of half-life. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2010; 32:988‐989.
21. Batra J, Itagaki S, Egorova NN, Chikwe J. Outcomes and long-term
effects of pregnancy in women with biologic and mechanical valve
prostheses. Am J Cardiol 2018;122:1738-1744.
Table 1: Preoperative baseline characteristics