References
1. ​Frater RW, Furlong P, Cosgrove DM, Okies JE, Colburn LQ, Katz AS, Lowe NL, Ryba EA. Long-term durability and patient functional status of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:48-53.
2. ​Kulik A, Bédard P, Lam BK, Rubens FD, Hendry PJ, Masters RG, Mesana TG, Ruel M.Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 30:485-491.
3. ​Chikwe J, Chiang YP, Egorova NN, Itagaki S, Adams DH. Survival and outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical mitral valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years. JAMA2015; 313:1435-1442.
4. ​Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Guyton RA, O’Gara PT, Ruiz CE, Skubas NJ, Sorajja P, Sundt TM 3rd, Thomas JD; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014; 129:2440-2492.
5. ​Wang Y, Chen S, Shi J, Li G, Dong N. Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis. Interact CardiovascThorac Surg 2015; 22:1–7.
6. ​Cunanan CM, Cabiling CM, Dinh TT, Shen SH, Tran-Hata P, Rutledge JH 3rd, Fishbein MC. Tissue characterization and calcification potential of commercial bioprosthetic heart valves. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71:417-421.
7. ​Kaneko T, Aranki S, Javed Q, McGurk S, Shekar P, Davidson M, Cohn L. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in patients<65 years old. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147:117-126.
8. ​Kyriacou DN, Lewis RJ. Confounding by indication in clinical research. JAMA. 2016; 316:1818–1819.
9. ​Sordelli C, Severino S, Ascione L, Coppolino P, Caso P. Echocardiographic assessment of heart valve prostheses. J Cardiovasc Echogr2014; 24:103-113.
10. ​Castillo JG, Solís J, González-Pinto A, Adams DH. Surgical echocardiography of the mitral valve.  Rev Esp Cardiol 2011; 64:1169–1181.
11. ​Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 1999;94:496-509.
12. Tillquist MN, Maddox TM. Cardiac crossroads: deciding between mechanical or bioprosthetic heart valve replacement. Patient Prefer Adherence 2011; 5:91–99.
13. ​Fino C, Iacovoni A, Pibarot P, Pepper JR, Ferrero P, Merlo M, Galletti L, Caputo M, Ferrazzi P, Anagnostopoulos C, Cugola D, Senni M, Bellavia D, Magne J. Exercise hemodynamic and functional capacity after mitral valve replacement in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation: a comparison of mechanical versus biological prostheses. Circ Heart Fail 2018;11:e004056.
14. ​Iung B, Rodes-Cabau J. The optimal management of anti-thrombotic therapy after valve replacement: certainties and uncertainties. Eur Heart J 2014; 35:2942-2949.
15. ​Gammie JS, Sheng S, Griffith BP, Peterson ED, Rankin JS, O’Brien SM, Brown JM. Trends in mitral valve surgery in the United States: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Database. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87:1431-1439.
16. ​Woo YJ, Greene CL. Prosthetic valve choice in middle-aged patients:guidelines and other guiding principles. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 49:1468-1469.
17. ​Rahimtoola SH. Choice of prosthetic heart valve in adults. Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55:2413–2426.
18. ​Hui C, Lili M, Libin C, Rui Z, Fang G, Ling G, Jianping Z. Changes in coagulation and hemodynamics during pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study of 58 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 285:1231-1236.
19. ​Applegate PM, Boyd WD, Applegate li RL, Liu H. Is it the time to reconsider the choice of valves for cardiac surgery: mechanical or bioprosthetic? J Biomed Res 2017; 31:373–376.
20. ​Walfisch A, Koren G. The ”warfarin window” in pregnancy: the importance of half-life. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2010; 32:988‐989.
21. ​Batra J, Itagaki S, Egorova NN, Chikwe J. Outcomes and long-term effects of pregnancy in women with biologic and mechanical valve prostheses. Am J Cardiol 2018;122:1738-1744.
Table 1: Preoperative baseline characteristics