REFERENCES
1. Cilingiroglu M, Salinger M, Zhao D, Feldman T. Technique of temporary
subcutaneous ”Figure-of-Eight” sutures to achieve hemostasis after
removal of large-caliber femoral venous sheaths. Catheter Cardiovasc
Interv. 2011;78(1):155-60.
2. Morgan GJ, Waragai T, Eastaugh L, Chaturvedi RC, Lee KJ, Benson L.
The fellows stitch: large caliber venous hemostasis in pediatric
practice. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;80(1):79-82.
3. Zhou Y, Guo Z, Bai Y, Zhao X, Qin Y, Chen S, et al. Femoral venous
hemostasis in children using the technique of ”figure-of-eight” sutures.
Congenit Heart Dis. 2014;9(2):122-5.
4. Issa ZF, Amr BS. Venous hemostasis postcatheter ablation of atrial
fibrillation while under therapeutic levels of oral and intravenous
anticoagulation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;44(2):97-104.
5. Aytemir K, Canpolat U, Yorgun H, Evranos B, Kaya EB, Sahiner ML, et
al. Usefulness of ’figure-of-eight’ suture to achieve haemostasis after
removal of 15-French calibre femoral venous sheath in patients
undergoing cryoablation. Europace. 2016;18(10):1545-50.
6. Pracon R, Bangalore S, Henzel J, Cendrowska-Demkow I,
Pregowska-Chwala B, Tarnowska A, et al. A randomized comparison of
modified subcutaneous ”Z”-stitch versus manual compression to achieve
hemostasis after large caliber femoral venous sheath removal. Catheter
Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;91(1):105-12.
7. Lakshmanadoss U, Wong WS, Kutinsky I, Khalid MR, Williamson B, Haines
DE. Figure-of-eight suture for venous hemostasis in fully anticoagulated
patients after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. Indian Pacing
Electrophysiol J. 2017;17(5):134-9.
8. Payne J, Bickel T, Gautam S. Figure-of-eight sutures for hemostasis
result in shorter lab recovery time after ablation for atrial
fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018.
9. Okada M, Inoue K, Tanaka K, Ninomiya Y, Hirao Y, Oka T, et al.
Efficacy and Safety of Figure-of-Eight Suture for Hemostasis After
Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation. Circ J.
2018;82(4):956-64.
10. Jensen CJ, Schnur M, Lask S, Attanasio P, Gotzmann M, Kara K, et al.
Feasibility of the Figure-of-8-Suture as Venous Closure in
Interventional Electrophysiology: One Strategy for All? Int J Med Sci.
2020;17(7):965-9.
11. Akkaya E, Berkowitsch A, Zaltsberg S, Deubner N, Greiss H, Hain A,
et al. Safety and feasibility of percutaneous skin closure using
purse-string suture compared with compression bandage after pulmonary
vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017;28(9):1048-57.
12. Kumar V, Wish M, Venkataraman G, Bliden K, Jindal M, Strickberger A.
A randomized comparison of manual pressure versus figure-of-eight suture
for hemostasis after cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation. J
Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30(12):2806-10.
13. Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, Brugada J, Camm AJ, Chen SA, et al.
2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical
Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection,
procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions,
endpoints, and research trial design. Europace. 2012;14(4):528-606.
14. Barbetta I, van den Berg JC. Access and hemostasis: femoral and
popliteal approaches and closure devices-why, what, when, and how? Semin
Intervent Radiol. 2014;31(4):353-60.
15. Dangas G, Mehran R, Kokolis S, Feldman D, Satler LF, Pichard AD, et
al. Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions
following hemostasis with manual compression versus arteriotomy closure
devices. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(3):638-41.
16. Geis NA, Pleger ST, Chorianopoulos E, Muller OJ, Katus HA,
Bekeredjian R. Feasibility and clinical benefit of a suture-mediated
closure device for femoral vein access after percutaneous edge-to-edge
mitral valve repair. EuroIntervention. 2015;10(11):1346-53.
17. Mahadevan VS, Jimeno S, Benson LN, McLaughlin PR, Horlick EM.
Pre-closure of femoral venous access sites used for large-sized sheath
insertion with the Perclose device in adults undergoing cardiac
intervention. Heart. 2008;94(5):571-2.
18. Maraj I, Budzikowski AS, Ali W, Mitre CA, Kassotis J. Use of
vascular closure device is safe and effective in electrophysiological
procedures. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;43(2):193-5.
19. Shaw JA, Dewire E, Nugent A, Eisenhauer AC. Use of suture-mediated
vascular closure devices for the management of femoral vein access after
transcatheter procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004;63(4):439-43.
20. Hamid T, Choudhury TR, Clarke B, Mahadevan VS. Pre-closure of
Large-Sized Arterial Access Sites in Adults Undergoing Transcatheter
Structural Interventions. Cardiol Ther. 2015;4(1):59-63.
21. Mylonas I, Sakata Y, Salinger M, Sanborn TA, Feldman T. The use of
percutaneous suture-mediated closure for the management of 14 French
femoral venous access. J Invasive Cardiol. 2006;18(7):299-302.
22. Hermiller JB, Leimbach W, Gammon R, Karas SP, Whitbourn RJ, Wong SC,
et al. A prospective, randomized, pivotal trial of a novel extravascular
collagen-based closure device compared to manual compression in
diagnostic and interventional patients. J Invasive Cardiol.
2015;27(3):129-36.
23. Boer C, Meesters MI, Veerhoek D, Vonk ABA. Anticoagulant and
side-effects of protamine in cardiac surgery: a narrative review. Br J
Anaesth. 2018;120(5):914-27.