References
1. Blustein J, Liu J. Time to consider the risks of caesarean delivery
for long term child health. BMJ : British Medical Journal.
2015;350:h2410.
2. Keag OE, Norman JE, Stock SJ. Long-term risks and benefits associated
with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies:
Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Medicine. 2018;15(1):e1002494.
3. Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gulmezoglu AM. WHO Statement on
Caesarean Section Rates. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics
and gynaecology. 2016;123(5):667-70.
4. Lavender T, Hofmeyr GJ, Neilson JP, Kingdon C, Gyte GML. Caesarean
section for non‐medical reasons at term. Cochrane Database of Systematic
Reviews. 2012(3).
5. Macefield RC, Boulind CE, Blazeby JM. Selecting and measuring optimal
outcomes for randomised controlled trials in surgery. Langenbecks Arch
Surg. 2014;399(3):263-72.
6. Saini P, Loke YK, Gamble C, Altman DG, Williamson PR, Kirkham JJ.
Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from
a cohort of systematic reviews. Bmj. 2014;349:g6501.
7. Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Devane D, Gargon E,
et al. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to
consider. Trials. 2012;13:132.
8. Smith P, Cooper N, Dhillon-Smith R, O’Toole E, Clark TJ, Coomarasamy
A. Core Outcome Sets in Miscarriage Trials (COSMisT) study: a study
protocol. BMJ Open. 2017;7(11):e018535.
9. Williamson P, Clarke M. The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in
Effectiveness Trials) Initiative: its role in improving Cochrane
Reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012(4).
10. Khan K. The CROWN Initiative: journal editors invite researchers to
develop core outcomes in women’s health. BJOG: An International Journal
of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2014;121(10):1181-2.
11. Molloy EJ, Gale C, Marsh M, Bearer CF, Devane D, Modi N. Developing
core outcome set for women’s, newborn, and child health: the CROWN
Initiative. Pediatric Research. 2018;84(3):316-7.
12. Duffy JM, van ’t Hooft J, Gale C, Brown M, Grobman W, Fitzpatrick R,
et al. A protocol for developing, disseminating, and implementing a core
outcome set for pre-eclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2016;6(4):274-8.
13. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis
JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and
meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions:
explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.
14. van ’t Hooft J, Alfirevic Z, Asztalos EV, Biggio JR, Dugoff L,
Hoffman M, et al. CROWN initiative and preterm birth prevention:
researchers and editors commit to implement core outcome sets. BJOG : an
international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2018;125(1):8-11.
15. Perry H, Duffy JMN, Reed K, Baschat A, Deprest J, Hecher K, et al. A
core outcome set for the evaluation of treatments for twin-twin
transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the
official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in
Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018.
16. de Mattos Lourenco TR, Pergialiotis V, Duffy JMN, Durnea C, Elfituri
A, Haddad JM, et al. A systematic review on reporting outcomes and
outcome measures in trials on synthetic mesh procedures for pelvic organ
prolapse: Urgent action is needed to improve quality of research.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(2):509-24.
17. Durnea CM, Pergialiotis V, Duffy JMN, Bergstrom L, Elfituri A,
Doumouchtsis SK. A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure
reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for
anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a
core outcome set. International urogynecology journal.
2018;29(12):1727-45.
18. Harman NL, Bruce IA, Callery P, Tierney S, Sharif MO, O’Brien K, et
al. MOMENT–Management of Otitis Media with Effusion in Cleft Palate:
protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of
a core outcome set using a Delphi survey. Trials. 2013;14:70.
19. Cordoba G, Schwartz L, Woloshin S, Bae H, Gøtzsche PC. Definition,
reporting, and interpretation of composite outcomes in clinical trials:
systematic review. BMJ. 2010;341:c3920.
20. Macharey G, Vaisanen-Tommiska M, Gissler M, Ulander VM, Rahkonen L,
Nuutila M, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome at the age of 4 years
according to the planned mode of delivery in term breech presentation: A
nationwide, population-based record linkage study. Journal of Perinatal
Medicine. 2018;46(3):333-9.
21. Maier B, Georgoulopoulos A, Zajc M, Jaeger T, Zuchna C, Hasenoehrl
G. Fetal outcome for infants in breech by method of delivery:
Experiences with a stand-by service system of senior obstetricians and
women’s choices of mode of delivery. Journal of Perinatal Medicine.
2011;39(4):385-90.
22. Robson SJ, de Costa C, Woods C, Ding P, Rane A. Maternal-choice
caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth in low-risk primigravid
women. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
2018;58(4):469-73.
23. Duffy J, Rolph R, Gale C, Hirsch M, Khan K, Ziebland S, et al. Core
outcome sets in women’s and newborn health: a systematic review. BJOG:
An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.
2017;124(10):1481-9.
24. Kirkham JJ, Boers M, Tugwell P, Clarke M, Williamson PR. Outcome
measures in rheumatoid arthritis randomised trials over the last 50
years. Trials. 2013;14:324.
25. Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and
reporting of research evidence. Lancet. 2009;374(9683):86-9.
26. Hirsch M, Duffy JMN, Barker C, Hummelshoj L, Johnson NP, Mol B, et
al. Protocol for developing, disseminating and implementing a core
outcome set for endometriosis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(12):e013998.
27. Webbe J, Brunton G, Ali S, Duffy JM, Modi N, Gale C. Developing,
implementing and disseminating a core outcome set for neonatal medicine.
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2017;1(1):e000048.
28. Kirkham JJ, Dwan KM, Altman DG, Gamble C, Dodd S, Smyth R, et al.
The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on
a cohort of systematic reviews. BMJ. 2010;340:c365.