References
1. Wass V, Van Der Vleuten C, Shatzer J, Jones R. Assessment of clinical
competence. Lancet. 2001;357(9260):945-949.
2. Cook DA, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Hamstra SJ, Hatala R.
Technology-enhanced simulation to assess health professionals: A
systematic review of validity evidence, research methods, and reporting
quality. Acad Med. 2013;88(6):872-883.
3. Vleuten C Van Der. The assessment of professional competence:
developments, research and practical implications. Adv Heal Sci Educ.
1996;1:41-67.
4. Ghaderi I, Manji F, Soo Park Y, Dorthea Juul, Ott, Ilene Harris et
al. Technical skills assessment toolbox a review using the unitary
framework of validity. Ann Surg. 2015;261(2):251-262.
5. Jelovsek JE, Kow N, Diwadkar GB. Tools for the direct observation and
assessment of psychomotor skills in medical trainees: A systematic
review. Med Educ. 2013;47(7):650-673
6. Epstein RM. Medical education - Assessment in medical education. N
Engl J Med. 2007;356(4):387-396.
7. Kane MT. The assessment of professionel competence. Evaluation & the
Health Professions. 1992;15:163-182
8. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review
types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J.
2009;26(2):91-108
9. Arksey H, O ’malley L. Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological
Framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19-32
10. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studes: advancing the
methodology. Implement Sciene. 2010;5(69):1-9
11. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK , Heather Colquhoun,
Danielle Levac et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR):
Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467-473
12. Cook DA, Brydges R, Ginsburg S, Hatala R. A contemporary approach to
validity arguments: A practical guide to Kane’s framework. Med Educ.
2015;49:560-575
13. Hatala R, Cook DA, Brydges R, Hawkins R. Constructing a validity
argument for the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills
(OSATS): a systematic review of validity evidence. Adv Heal Sci Educ.
2015;20:1149-1175
14. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, Macrae H, Murnaghanet J, Hutchison C
et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for
surgical residents. Br J Surg. 1997;84(2):273-278
15. Szasz P, Louridas M, Harris KA, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP.
Assessing technical competence in surgical trainees: A systematic
review. Ann Surg. 2015;261(6):1046-1055.
16. Hiemstra E, Kolkman W, Wolterbeek R, Trimbos B, Jansen FW. Value of
an objective assessment tool in the operating room. Can J Surg.
2011;54(2):116-122.
17. Chen CCG, Korn A, Klingele C, Barber MD, Paraiso MFR, Walters MD et
al. Objective assessment of vaginal surgical skills. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 2010; 203:79.e1-8
18. Chou B, Bowen CW, Handa VL. Evaluating the competency of gynecology
residents in the operating room: validation of a new assessment tool. Am
J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199:571.e1-571.e5
19. Larsen CR, Grantcharov T, Schouenborg L, Ottosen C, Soerensen JL,
Ottesen B. Objective assessment of surgical competence in gynaecological
laparoscopy: Development and validation of a procedure-specific rating
scale. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115(7):908-916
20. Frederick PJ, Szender JB, Hussein AA, Kesterson JP, Shelton JA,
Anderson TL et al. Surgical Competency for Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy:
Development and Validation of a Robotic Hysterectomy Assessment Score
(RHAS). Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology; 2017;24:55-61.
21. Goderstad JM, Sandvik L, Fosse E, Lieng M. Assessment of surgical
competence: Development and validation of rating scales used for
laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. J Surg Educ.
2016;73(4):600-608.
22. Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, Bergman S, Leffondré Ket,
Stanbrigde D al. A global assessment tool for evaluation of
intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg. 2005;190(1):107-113.
23. Savran MM, Hoffmann E, Konge L, Ottosen C, Larsen CR. Objective
assessment of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Development and
validation of a feasible rating scale for formative and summative
feedback. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;237:74-78.
24. Husslein H, Shirreff L, Shore EM, Lefebvre GG, Grantcharov TP. The
Generic Error Rating Tool: A Novel Approach to Assessment of Performance
and Surgical Education in Gynecologic Laparoscopy. J Surg Educ. 2015;
72(6):1259-1265.
25. Driessen SRC, Sandberg EM, Chapelle CF, Twijnstra ARH, Rhemrev JPT,
Jansen FW. Case-Mix Variables and Predictors for Outcomes of
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy : A Systematic Review. J Minim Invasive
Gynecol. 2016;23(3):317-330.
26. Strandbygaard J, Bjerrum F, Maagaard M, Rifbjerg Larsen C, Ottesen
B, Sorensen JL. A structured four-step curriculum in basic laparoscopy:
Development and validation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.
2014;93(4):359-366.
27. Langerman A, Grantcharov TP. Are We Ready for Our Close-up? Ann
Surg. 2017;266(6):934-936.
28. Oestergaard J, Larsen CR, Maagaard M, Grantcharov T, Ottesen B,
Sorensen JL. Can both residents and chief physicians assess surgical
skills? Surg Endosc. 2012;26(7):2054-2060.
29. Strandbygaard J, Scheele F, Sørensen JL. Twelve tips for assessing
surgical performance and use of technical assessment scales. Med Teach.
2017;39(1):32-37.
30. Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Gonsalves C, Wood TJ. Using consensus
group methods such as Delphi and Nominal Group in medical education
research*. Med Teach. 2017;39(1):14-19.
doi:10.1080/0142159X.2017.1245856
31. Ahmed K, Miskovic D, Darzi A, Athanasiou T, Hanna GB. Observational
tools for assessment of procedural skills: A systematic review. Am J
Surg. 2011;202:469-480.
32. Ma IWY, Zalunardo N, Pachev G, Beran T, Brown M, Hatala R et al.
Comparing the use of global rating scale with checklists for the
assessment of central venous catheterization skills using simulation.
Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2012;17(4):457-470.
Table S1 Overview of studies identified for inclusion.