Hiemstra et al. 21
2011
|
OSATS
Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills
|
Observational study
Self-assessment and peri- and postoperative assessment by
supervisor
|
Generic scale
1) Respect for tissue 2) Time and motion 3)
Knowledge and handling of instrument 4) Flow of operation
5) Use of assistants 6) Knowledge of specific
procedure
|
Chen et al.1 8
2010
|
VSSI
Vaginal Surgical Skills Index
|
Observational study
Assessment by supervisor and blinded reviewer of video recording
|
Generic and procedure-specific scale
1) Initial inspection 2) Incision 3)
Maintenance of visibility 4) Use of assistants 5)
Knowledge of instruments 6) Tissue and instrument handling
7) Electro surgery 8) Knot tying 9)
Haemostasis 10) Procedure completion 11) Time and
motion 12) Flow of operation and forward planning 13)
Knowledge of specific procedure
|
Chou B et al.19
2008
|
HASC
Hopkins Assessment of Surgical Competency
|
Observational study
Self-assessment and assessment by supervisor
|
Generic and procedure-specific scale
General surgical skills: 1) Knowledge/avoidance of
potential complications, 2) Respected tissue, 3)
Instrument Handling, 4) Time and motion/moves not wasted,
5) Bleeding controlled, 6) Flow of operation
Specific surgical skills: 1) Knowledge of patient
history/surgical indication, 2) Knowledge of anatomy,
3) Patient properly positioned on table/in stirrups,
4) Proper placement of retractors, 5) Proper assembly
equipment, 6) Proper positioning of lights
|
Larsen CR et al.20
2008
|
OSALS
Objective Structured Assessment of Laparoscopic Salpingectomy
|
Prospective cohort study
Blinded video assessment by two observers
|
Generic and procedure-specific scale
OSALS general skills 1) Economy of movement, 2)
Confidence of movement, 3) Economy of time, 4) Errors;
respect for tissue, 5) Flow of operation/operative technique
OSALS specific skills: 1) Presentation of anatomy,
2) Use of diathermy, 3) Dissection of fallopian tube,
4) Care for ovary, ovarian artery and pelvic wall, 5)
Extraction of fallopian tube
|
Peter J. Frederick et al.15
2016
|
RHAS
Robot Hysterectomy Assessment Score
|
Observational study
Blinded video assessment by expert reviewers
|
Procedure-specific scale
1) Handling of the round ligament, 2) Developing the
bladder flap, 3) Isolating and securing the infundibulopelvic
ligament (or utero-ovarian ligament if the ovaries were retained),
4) Securing the uterine vessels, 5) Performing the
colpotomy and 6) Closing the vaginal cuff
|
Jeanne Goderstad et al.16
2016
|
CAT-LSH
Competence Assessment for Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy
|
Prospective interobserver study
Blinded video assessment by expert reviewers
|
Procedure-specific scale
1) Ligament mobilisation, 2) Release of adnexa form
uterus, 3) Division of uterine vessels, 4) Uterus
amputation
|
Savren et al.23
2019
|
Feasible rating scale for formative and summative feedback
|
Prospective cohort study
Blinded video assessment by two observers
|
Procedure-specific scale
1) Division of fallopian tube and uteroovarian OR division of
the infundibulopelvix ligament 2) Dividing the round ligament
3) Care for the ureter 4) Opening the utero-vesicale
peritoneum 5) Identification and skeletonising 6)
Presentation and ligation of uterine arteries 7) Opening of the
vagina 8) Suturing (catching the needle) 9) Driving
the needle through tissue, 10) Placement and depth of sutures
in the vaginal cuff, 11) Suturing of the vagina and tying the
knot
|
Heinrich Husslein et al. 24
2015
|
GERT
Generic Error Rating Tool
|
Prospective observational study
Blinded video assessment by expert reviewers
|
Error assessment - generic and procedure-specific scale
1) Abdominal access and removal of instruments or trocars,
2) Use of retractors, 3) Use of energy, 4)
Grasping and dissection, 5) Cutting, transection and stapling,
6) Clipping, 7) Suturing, 8) Use of suction,
9) Other
Each generic task subdivided into four distinct error modes:
(1) Too much use of force or distance, 2) Too little
use of force or distance, 3) Inadequate visualisation,
4) Wrong orientation of instrument
Procedure subdivided into: 1) Insertion of trocars,
2) Creation of bladder flap, 3) Colpotomy 4)
Vault closure
|
Jeanne Goderstad et al.16
2016
|
CAT-LSH
Competence Assessment for Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy
|
Prospective interobserver study
Blinded video assessment by expert reviewers
|
Procedure-specific scale
1) Ligament mobilisation, 2) Release of adnexa form
uterus, 3) Division of uterine vessels, 4) Uterus
amputation
|
Savren et al.23
2019
|
Feasible rating scale for formative and summative feedback
|
Prospective cohort study
Blinded video assessment by two observers
|
Procedure-specific scale
1) Division of fallopian tube and uteroovarian OR division of
the infundibulopelvix ligament 2) Dividing the round ligament
3) Care for the ureter 4) Opening the utero-vesicale
peritoneum 5) Identification and skeletonising 6)
Presentation and ligation of uterine arteries 7) Opening of the
vagina 8) Suturing (catching the needle) 9) Driving
the needle through tissue, 10) Placement and depth of sutures
in the vaginal cuff, 11) Suturing of the vagina and tying the
knot
|
Heinrich Husslein et al. 24
2015
|
GERT
Generic Error Rating Tool
|
Prospective observational study
Blinded video assessment by expert reviewers
|
Error assessment - generic and procedure-specific scale
1) Abdominal access and removal of instruments or trocars,
2) Use of retractors, 3) Use of energy, 4)
Grasping and dissection, 5) Cutting, transection and stapling,
6) Clipping, 7) Suturing, 8) Use of suction,
9) Other
Each generic task subdivided into four distinct error modes:
(1) Too much use of force or distance, 2) Too little
use of force or distance, 3) Inadequate visualisation,
4) Wrong orientation of instrument
Procedure subdivided into: 1) Insertion of trocars,
2) Creation of bladder flap, 3) Colpotomy 4)
Vault closure
|