References
1. Wass V, Van Der Vleuten C, Shatzer J, Jones R. Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet. 2001;357(9260):945-949.
2. Cook DA, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Hamstra SJ, Hatala R. Technology-enhanced simulation to assess health professionals: A systematic review of validity evidence, research methods, and reporting quality. Acad Med. 2013;88(6):872-883.
3. Vleuten C Van Der. The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 1996;1:41-67.
4. Ghaderi I, Manji F, Soo Park Y, Dorthea Juul, Ott, Ilene Harris et al. Technical skills assessment toolbox a review using the unitary framework of validity. Ann Surg. 2015;261(2):251-262.
5. Jelovsek JE, Kow N, Diwadkar GB. Tools for the direct observation and assessment of psychomotor skills in medical trainees: A systematic review. Med Educ. 2013;47(7):650-673
6. Epstein RM. Medical education - Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(4):387-396.
7. Kane MT. The assessment of professionel competence. Evaluation & the Health Professions. 1992;15:163-182
8. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(2):91-108
9. Arksey H, O ’malley L. Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19-32
10. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studes: advancing the methodology. Implement Sciene. 2010;5(69):1-9
11. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK , Heather Colquhoun, Danielle Levac et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467-473
12. Cook DA, Brydges R, Ginsburg S, Hatala R. A contemporary approach to validity arguments: A practical guide to Kane’s framework. Med Educ. 2015;49:560-575
13. Hatala R, Cook DA, Brydges R, Hawkins R. Constructing a validity argument for the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS): a systematic review of validity evidence. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2015;20:1149-1175
14. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, Macrae H, Murnaghanet J, Hutchison C et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg. 1997;84(2):273-278
15. Szasz P, Louridas M, Harris KA, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP. Assessing technical competence in surgical trainees: A systematic review. Ann Surg. 2015;261(6):1046-1055.
16. Hiemstra E, Kolkman W, Wolterbeek R, Trimbos B, Jansen FW. Value of an objective assessment tool in the operating room. Can J Surg. 2011;54(2):116-122.
17. Chen CCG, Korn A, Klingele C, Barber MD, Paraiso MFR, Walters MD et al. Objective assessment of vaginal surgical skills. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203:79.e1-8
18. Chou B, Bowen CW, Handa VL. Evaluating the competency of gynecology residents in the operating room: validation of a new assessment tool. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199:571.e1-571.e5
19. Larsen CR, Grantcharov T, Schouenborg L, Ottosen C, Soerensen JL, Ottesen B. Objective assessment of surgical competence in gynaecological laparoscopy: Development and validation of a procedure-specific rating scale. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115(7):908-916
20. Frederick PJ, Szender JB, Hussein AA, Kesterson JP, Shelton JA, Anderson TL et al. Surgical Competency for Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy: Development and Validation of a Robotic Hysterectomy Assessment Score (RHAS). Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology; 2017;24:55-61.
21. Goderstad JM, Sandvik L, Fosse E, Lieng M. Assessment of surgical competence: Development and validation of rating scales used for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. J Surg Educ. 2016;73(4):600-608.
22. Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, Bergman S, Leffondré Ket, Stanbrigde D al. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg. 2005;190(1):107-113.
23. Savran MM, Hoffmann E, Konge L, Ottosen C, Larsen CR. Objective assessment of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Development and validation of a feasible rating scale for formative and summative feedback. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;237:74-78.
24. Husslein H, Shirreff L, Shore EM, Lefebvre GG, Grantcharov TP. The Generic Error Rating Tool: A Novel Approach to Assessment of Performance and Surgical Education in Gynecologic Laparoscopy. J Surg Educ. 2015; 72(6):1259-1265.
25. Driessen SRC, Sandberg EM, Chapelle CF, Twijnstra ARH, Rhemrev JPT, Jansen FW. Case-Mix Variables and Predictors for Outcomes of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy : A Systematic Review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(3):317-330.
26. Strandbygaard J, Bjerrum F, Maagaard M, Rifbjerg Larsen C, Ottesen B, Sorensen JL. A structured four-step curriculum in basic laparoscopy: Development and validation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93(4):359-366.
27. Langerman A, Grantcharov TP. Are We Ready for Our Close-up? Ann Surg. 2017;266(6):934-936.
28. Oestergaard J, Larsen CR, Maagaard M, Grantcharov T, Ottesen B, Sorensen JL. Can both residents and chief physicians assess surgical skills? Surg Endosc. 2012;26(7):2054-2060.
29. Strandbygaard J, Scheele F, Sørensen JL. Twelve tips for assessing surgical performance and use of technical assessment scales. Med Teach. 2017;39(1):32-37.
30. Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Gonsalves C, Wood TJ. Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and Nominal Group in medical education research*. Med Teach. 2017;39(1):14-19. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2017.1245856
31. Ahmed K, Miskovic D, Darzi A, Athanasiou T, Hanna GB. Observational tools for assessment of procedural skills: A systematic review. Am J Surg. 2011;202:469-480.
32. Ma IWY, Zalunardo N, Pachev G, Beran T, Brown M, Hatala R et al. Comparing the use of global rating scale with checklists for the assessment of central venous catheterization skills using simulation. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2012;17(4):457-470.
Table S1 Overview of studies identified for inclusion.