The article by Veronese et al.1 on aspirin utilization
illustrates a common issue in medicine, validating efficacy and safety
of therapeutics and the balance sought. Among the many, often
predictable factors affecting clinical efficacy, is the mechanism of
action, the physiologic/pharmacologic properties that produce the
desired result. For aspirin, the major clinically pertinent effect is
reduction of platelet aggregation/stickiness. It was once believed that
low dose aspirin was sufficient for this benefit and it was assumed that
treatment failures were related to other factors.2However, medicine has moved into the era of evidence-based assessments.
And, when efficacy of aspirin in reducing platelet aggregation was
actually tested in vitro, routine prescription of aspirin was found to
be variable in such reduction. Ten times the 81 mg dose was often
required to alter results in the appropriate collagen and ADP platelet
function tests.3 Further complicating assessment of
aspirin efficacy are individuals with anti-phospholipid syndrome.
Anti-phospholipid antibodies are not rare.4 Afflicted
individuals require warfarin-induced prothrombin time INRs in excess of
standard dosing5 and the very convenient fractionated
heparins lack efficacy in preventing thromboembolic
events.6 Similar potential issues perhaps deserve
consideration in establishing and applying aspirin recommendations.
Recognizing that aspirin use carries with it morbidity and even
mortality risks,7 should not its efficacy (at the
prescribed dose) be routinely subject to in vitro (platelet function)
testing? If we are to prescribe a medication for a specific benefit, it
seems only reasonable to verify that individual variation does not
interfere with the desired mechanism of action? The issue is not whether
to use aspirin but, rather, how. Risk without assuring potential benefit
should be avoided. Are the individuals who bleed more likely to be those
for whom dosage was suboptimal? Perhaps we should assure adequate dose
or not use it at all.
B Rothschild, 5010 N Weir, Muncie, IN 47303, 785-615-1523,
spondylair@gmail.com
There are no financial associations or other possible conflicts .
- Veronese N, Demurtas J, Thompson T, et al. Effect of low-dose aspirin
on health outcomes: An umbrella review of systemic reviews
andmeta-analyses. Br J Clini pHarmacol 2020;1-11. Doi:
10.1111/bcp.14310
- Arnaud L, Mathian A, Ruffatti A, et al. Efficacy of aspirin for the
primary prevention of thrombosis in patients with antiphospholipid
antibodies: An international and collaborative meta-analysis.Autoimmun Rev 2014;13:281-291.
- Perneby C, Wallén NH, Rooney C, et al. Dose- and time-dependent
antiplatelet effects of aspirin. Thromb Haemost 2006;95:652-658
- Garcia D, Erkan D. Diagnosis and management of the antiphospholipid
syndrome. N Eng J Med. 2018;378:2010-2021.
- Khamashta MA, Cuadrado MJ, Mujic F, et al. The management of
thrombosis in the antiphospholipid-antibody syndrome. N Engl J
Med 1995;332:993-997.
- Ziakas PD, Pavlou M, Voulgarelis M. Heparin treatment in
antiphospholipid syndrome with recurrent pregnancy loss: A systematic
review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:1256-1262
- Gaziano M, Brotons C, Coppolecchia R, et al. Use of aspirin to reduce
risk of initial vascular events in patients at moderate risk of
cardiovascular disease (ARRIVE): A randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2018;392:1036-1046.