References
1. Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 2008; 300:1311-16.
2. Barber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2013; 24:1783-90.
3. El SR, Alt CD, Maccioni F, Meissnitzer M, Masselli G, Manganaro L et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor dysfunction - joint recommendations of the ESUR and ESGAR Pelvic Floor Working Group. Eur Radiol 2017; 27:2067-85.
4. Maglinte DD, Bartram CI, Hale DA, Park J, Kohli MD, Robb BW et al. Functional imaging of the pelvic floor. Radiology 2011; 258: 23-39.
5. El SR, El MS, Farag A, Morsy MM, Abdel AM. Pelvic floor dysfunction: assessment with combined analysis of static and dynamic MR imaging findings. Radiology 2008; 248:518-30.
6. Stoker J, Halligan S, Bartram CI. Pelvic floor imaging. Radiology 2001; 218:621-41.
7. Healy JC, Halligan S, Reznek RH, Watson S, Phillips RK, Armstrong P. Patterns of prolapse in women with symptoms of pelvic floor weakness: assessment with MR imaging. Radiology 1997; 203:77-81.
8. Fitzgerald J, Richter LA. The role of MRI in the diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders. Curr Urol Rep 2020; 21:26.
9. Broekhuis SR, Futterer JJ, Barentsz JO, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB. A systematic review of clinical studies on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: the use of reference lines and anatomical landmarks. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009; 20:721-29.
10. Xie B, Chen L, Xue Z, English EM, Fenner DE, Gaetke-Udager K et al. Comparison of measurement systems for posterior vaginal wall prolapse on magnetic resonance imaging. Int Urogynecol J 2019; 30:1269-77.
11. Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD, Camargo S, Dandolu V, Digesu A et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogynecol J 2016; 27:655-84.
12. DeLancey JO. Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166:1717-28.
13. Ramanah R, Berger MB, Parratte BM, DeLancey JO. Anatomy and histology of apical support: a literature review concerning cardinal and uterosacral ligaments. Int Urogynecol J 2012; 23:1483-94.
14. Höckel M, Horn L, Fritsch H. Association between the mesenchymal compartment of uterovaginal organogenesis and local tumour spread in stage IB–IIB cervical carcinoma: a prospective study. The Lancet Oncology 2005; 6:751-56
15. Zhao X, Chen G, Lei L, Wu X, Liu S, Wang J et al. Key anatomies of Delaney’s three levels of vaginal support theory: an observation in laparoscopic surgery. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2018; 47:329-37.
16. Luo J, Betschart C, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JOL. Quantitative analyses of variability in normal vaginal shape and dimension on MR images. Int Urogynecol J2016;27:1087-95.
17. Grob A, Heuvel JO, Futterer JJ, Massop D, Veenstra VNA, Simonis F et al. Underestimation of pelvic organ prolapse in the supine straining position, based on magnetic resonance imaging findings. Int Urogynecol J 2019; 30:1939-1944.
18. Yang A, Mostwin JL, Rosenshein NB, Zerhouni EA. Pelvic floor descent in women: dynamic evaluation with fast MR imaging and cinematic display. Radiology 1991; 179:25-33.
19. Singh K, Reid WM, Berger LA. Assessment and grading of pelvic organ prolapse by use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185:71-77.
20. Fauconnier A, Zareski E, Abichedid J, Bader G, Falissard B, Fritel X. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging for grading pelvic organ prolapse according to the International Continence Society classification: which line should be used? Neurourol Urodyn 2008; 27:191-97.
21. Barber MD, Brubaker L, Burgio KL, Richter HE, Nygaard I, Weidner AC et al. Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial. JAMA 2014; 311:1023-34.
22. Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson FM. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123:1201-06.
23. Vu D, Haylen BT, Tse K, Farnsworth A. Surgical anatomy of the uterosacral ligament. Int Urogynecol J 2010; 21:1123-28.
24. Buller JL, Thompson JR, Cundiff GW, Krueger SL, Schon YM, Bent AE. Uterosacral Ligament: Description of Anatomic Relationships to Optimize Surgical Safety. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97:873-79
25. Arenholt L, Pedersen BG, Glavind K, Glavind-Kristensen M, DeLancey J. Paravaginal defect: anatomy, clinical findings, and imaging. Int Urogynecol J 2017; 28:661-73
26. Larson KA, Hsu Y, Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. Magnetic resonance imaging-based three-dimensional model of anterior vaginal wall position at rest and maximal strain in women with and without prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2010; 21:1103-09.
27. Handa VL, Blomquist JL, McDermott KC, Friedman S, Munoz A. Pelvic floor disorders after vaginal birth: effect of episiotomy, perineal laceration, and operative birth. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119:233-239.
28. Hodroff MA, Stolpen AH, Denson MA, Bolinger L, Kreder KJ. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis: the relationship with the pelvic organ prolapse quantification staging system. J Urol 2002; 167:1353-55.