Indy Sandaradura

and 6 more

Aim: To evaluate current fluconazole dosing regimens against established pharmacodynamic targets in critically ill adults. Methods: Data from critically ill adults treated with fluconazole (n=30) were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model. Probability of target attainment (PTA) (fAUC24/MIC >100) was determined from simulations for four previously proposed dosing regimens; (i) 400 mg once daily (ii) a 800 mg loading dose followed by 400 mg once daily, (iii) 400 mg twice daily and (iv) a 12 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg once daily. The effect of body weight (40, 70, 120 kg) and renal function (continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), 20, 60, 120, 180 mL/min glomerular filtration rates) on PTA was assessed. Results: Early (0-48 h) fluconazole target attainment for patients with Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) of 2 mg/L was highly variable. PTA was highest with an 800 mg loading dose for underweight (40 kg) patients and with a 12 mg/kg loading dose for the remainder. End-of-treatment PTA was highest with 400 mg twice daily maintenance dosing for patients who were under- or normal- weight and 6 mg/kg maintenance dosing for overweight (120 kg) patients. None of the fluconazole regimens reliably attained early targets for MICs of ≥4 mg/L. Conclusion: Current fluconazole dosing regimens do not achieve adequate early target attainment in critically ill adults, particularly in those who are overweight, have higher renal function or are undergoing CRRT. Current fluconazole dosing strategies are generally inadequate to treat organisms with an MIC of ≥4 mg/L.

Melissa Baysari

and 3 more

Clinicians, patients, administrators and researchers have become increasingly frustrated by the lack of indication (i.e. problem) information included in prescriptions, despite the obvious benefit this would provide to patients and other healthcare providers [1]. Medication indications are not routinely documented by prescribers, both in inpatient and outpatient settings.[2, 3] Calls have been made to introduce a sixth ‘right’ into the medication management process, whereby the right patient is given the right drug and dose at the right time via the right route for the right indication [4]. Indications-based prescribing has recently gained traction as a potential way forward to facilitate indication documentation [4, 5]. Indications-based prescribing, not currently supported by most electronic prescribing systems (EPSs), describes the scenario where prescribers initially select an indication, not a medication, and the EPS presents the user with suggested medications for addressing the problem. There are clear advantages with this approach, including those associated with guided prescribing (e.g. more appropriate drug selections) and with indication documentation (e.g. improved communication between providers), prompting work to begin on developing EPS functionality in the US to support indications-based prescribing. In a recent usability evaluation of a prototype of this functionality, indications-based prescribing was more efficient to use, resulted in fewer medication errors and in higher usability scores than the traditional EPS functionality [6].