loading page

Resilience to maintain quality of care during birth in war torn Yemen: A retrospective criterion-based audit from a congested frontline hospital
  • +2
  • Josephine Obel,
  • Antonio Martin,
  • Abdul Mullahzada,
  • Ronald Kremer,
  • Nanna Maaloe
Josephine Obel
Hvidovre Hospital
Author Profile
Antonio Martin
Medecins Sans Frontieres
Author Profile
Abdul Mullahzada
Médecins Sans Frontières
Author Profile
Ronald Kremer
Medecins Sans Frontieres Operational Centre Amsterdam
Author Profile
Nanna Maaloe
University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences
Author Profile

Peer review status:UNDER REVIEW

18 Jun 2020Submitted to BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
19 Jun 2020Assigned to Editor
19 Jun 2020Submission Checks Completed
22 Jun 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To audit quality of intrapartum care and birth outcomes before and after a restriction in the number of women admitted in childbirth. This restriction policy was implemented as number of births vastly exceeded the pre-dimensioned capacity. DESIGN: A retrospective, comparative criterion-based audit. SETTING: Taiz Houbane Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Yemen. POPULATION: All women giving birth in a high-volume month (August 2017; n=1034) and a low-volume month (November 2017; n=436). METHOD: Criterion-based audit of case files was conducted for all caesarean sections (n=108 and n=82) and for 250 randomly selected vaginal births in each month. Birth outcomes were assessed for all women and newborns. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of sub-optimal quality of intrapartum care and adverse birth outcomes (stillbirths, intra-facility newborn deaths, and Apgar score <7). RESULTS: Background characteristics of women were comparable between the months. Rates of labour inductions and caesarean sections increased significantly in the low-volume month (14% vs. 22% (relative risk (RR) 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.87) and 11% vs. 19% (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42-0.71), respectively). No other care or birth outcome indicators were significantly different. Structural and human resources remained constant throughout, despite differences in patient volume. CONCLUSIONS: Assumptions regarding quality of care in periods of high demand may be misguiding - resilience to maintain quality of care was strong. We recommend health actors to closely monitor changes in quality of care when implementing resource changes - to enable safe care at birth for as many women as possible. FUNDING: Médecins Sans Frontières