References:
  1. Paradies V, Banning A, Cao D, Chieffo A, Daemen J, Diletti R, Hildick-Smith D, Kandzari DE, Kirtane AJ, Mehran R, Park DW, Tarantini G, Smits PC, Van Mieghem NM. Provisional Strategy for Left Main Stem Bifurcation Disease: A State-of-the-Art Review of Technique and Outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Apr 10;16(7):743-758.
  2. Movahed MR, Stinis CT. A new proposed simplified classification of coronary artery bifurcation lesions and bifurcation interventional techniques. J Invasive Cardiol. 2006 May;18(5):199-204.
  3. Movahed MR. Coronary artery bifurcation lesion classifications, interventional techniques and clinical outcome. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2008 Feb;6(2):261-74
  4. Movahed MR. Quantitative angiographic methods for bifurcation lesions: a consensus statement from the European Bifurcation Group. Shortcoming of the Medina classification as a preferred classification for coronary artery bifurcation lesions in comparison to the Movahed classification. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov 1;74(5):817-8.
  5. Movahed MR. Studies involving coronary bifurcation interventions should utilize the most comprehensive and technically relevant Movahed coronary bifurcation classification for better communication and accuracy. Am J Cardiol. 2010 Apr 15;105(8):1204-5
  6. Movahed MR. B2 lesions are true bifurcation lesions simply categorized as one group according to the Movahed bifurcation classification. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 May;22(5):252
  7. Movahed MR. Major limitations of randomized clinical trials involving coronary artery bifurcation interventions: time for redesigning clinical trials by involving only true bifurcation lesions and using appropriate bifurcation classification. J Interv Cardiol. 2011 Aug;24(4):295-301
  8. Movahed MR. Is it time to consider the Movahed classification as the preferred classification for coronary bifurcation lesions? EuroIntervention. 2010 Jan;5(6):652;