Figure and Table Legends
Figure 1 – Flow diagram demonstrating mode of delivery for woman within
the cohort.
Table 1 – Demographic characteristics of cohort. Data presented as mean
average, standard deviation and range. *Data presented as median and
interquartile range (IQR).
Figure 2
A Completion of vaginal delivery for different instrumental delivery
methods. Data are present as raw and adjusted odds ratio with Keilland’s
forceps delivery as referent group. * Adjusted for maternal BMI, birth
weight, parity, analgesia, experience of deliverer, fetal position and
fetal station.
B Immediate perinatal adverse outcome following all delivery modes. Data
are present as raw and adjusted odds ratio with pEmCS delivery as
referent group. ** Adjusted for maternal BMI, birth weight, analgesia,
experience of trial decision maker, indication for trial, experience of
deliverer, fetal position and fetal station.
Table 2 Immediate perinatal adverse outcomes following all delivery
modes
Supplementary Table 1 – Data representing all in-labour and delivery
variables
Supplementary Figure 1 – Receiver-operator characteristic curves
generated from multivariate regression analysis models
A Relationship between delivery mode and completed vaginal delivery -
adjusted for maternal BMI, birth weight, parity, analgesia, experience
of deliverer, fetal position and fetal station. AUC. 0.768 (Std Error
0.025)
B Relationship between delivery mode and overall composite risk score -
adjusted for maternal BMI, birth weight, analgesia, experience of trial
decision maker, indication for trial, experience of deliverer, fetal
position and fetal station. AUC 0.642 (Std Error 0.024)