Takatoshi Shigeta

and 9 more

Masateru Takigawa

and 15 more

Background: Although ablation energy (AE) and force-time integral (FTI) are well-known active predictors of lesion characteristics, these parameters do not reflect passive tissue reactions during ablation, which may instead be represented by drops in local impedance (LI). This study aimed to investigate if additional LI-data improves predicting lesion characteristics and steam-pops. Methods: RF applications at a range of powers (30W, 40W, and 50W), contact forces (8g, 15g, 25g, and 35g), and durations (10-180s) using perpendicular/parallel catheter orientations, were performed in excised porcine hearts (N=30). The correlation between AE, FTI and lesion characteristics was examined and the impact of LI (%LI-drop [%LID] defined by the ΔLI/Initial LI) was additionally assessed. Results: 375 lesions without steam-pops were examined. Ablation energy (W*s) and FTI (g*s) showed a positive correlation with lesion depth (ρ=0.824:P<0.0001 and ρ=0.708:P<0.0001), surface area (ρ=0.507:P<0.0001 and ρ=0.562:P<0.0001) and volume (ρ=0.807:P<0.0001 and ρ=0.685:P<0.0001). %LID also showed positive correlation individually with lesion depth (ρ=0.643:P<0.0001), surface area (ρ=0.547:P<0.0001) and volume (ρ=0.733, P<0.0001). However, the combined indices of AE*%LID and FTI*%LID provided significantly stronger correlation with lesion depth (ρ=0.834:P<0.0001 and ρ=0.809P<0.0001), surface area (ρ=0.529:P<0.0001 and ρ=0.656:P<0.0001) and volume (ρ=0.864:P<0.0001 and ρ=0.838:P<0.0001). This tendency was observed regardless of the catheter placement (parallel/perpendicular). AE (P=0.02) and %LID (P=0.002) independently remained as significant predictors to predict steam-pops (N=27). However, the AE*%LID did not increase the predictive power of steam-pops compared to the AE alone. Conclusion: LI, when combined with conventional parameters (AE and FTI), may provide stronger correlation with lesion characteristics.

Tatsuhiko Hirao

and 14 more

Introduction: The “crosstalk” (CST) ablation technique has been reported to reduce unnecessary ablation during cryoballoon (CB) ablation (CBA). Nevertheless, it is unclear which situations will necessitate the adoption of the technique. Methods and Results: The effect of the technique was analyzed in AF patients underwent CBA from July 2017 to February 2020. The balloon occlusion status and nadir temperature (NT) were compared, and all ablated PVs were categorized into three groups according to the necessity and effectiveness of the technique. Of 1082 superior PVs (SPVs), 16, 40, and 1026 were identified in the CST success group, CST failure group, and control group, respectively. The proportion of SPVs ablated with complete occlusion with CB was significantly higher in the CST success group (100%) than in the CST failure group (16.7%) or control group (49.4%) (CST success group vs. CST failure group, p<0.001; CST success group vs. control group, p<0.002). The proportion of SPVs ablated with NT ≤-46°C was higher in the CST success group (100%) than in the CST failure group (56.7%) (p<0.05). The CST ablation technique was always effective if CBA of the SPVs was performed with both complete occlusion and NT ≤-46°C and was almost always ineffective if it did not meet these two criteria (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 93%). Conclusion: Successful CST ablation was highly predicted if complete PV occlusion and NT ≤-46°C during CBA of the SPVs were achieved, which could be useful when adopting the technique targeting inferior PVs to reduce unnecessary freezing during SPV isolation.