References
1. Lee YY, Roberts CL, Patterson JA, Simpson JM, Nicholl MC, Morris JM, et al. Unexplained variation in hospital caesarean section rates. Med J Aust. 2013;199(5):348-53.
2. Souza JP, Gulmezoglu A, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Carroli G, Fawole B, et al. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Med. 2010;8:71.
3. Tanaka K, Mahomed K. The Ten-Group Robson Classification: A Single Centre Approach  Identifying Strategies to Optimise Caesarean Section Rates  Obstetrics and Gynecology International. 2017;2017:5.
4. Tura AK, Pijpers O, de Man M, Cleveringa M, Koopmans I, Gure T, et al. Analysis of caesarean sections using Robson 10-group classification system in a university hospital in eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(4):e020520.
5. AIHW. Australia’s health 2018. Canberra.
6. Welfare AIoHa. Australia’s mothers and babies 2017—in brief.; 2019. Contract No.: no. 35. Cat. no. PER 100. Canberra: AIHW.
7. Betran AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Gulmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn’t work and how to improve it. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e97769.
8. WHO. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. 2015.
9. WHO. Robson Classification: Implementation Manual. Geneva2017.
10. Torloni MR, Betran AP, Souza JP, Widmer M, Allen T, Gulmezoglu M, et al. Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e14566.
11. Pyykönen A, Gissler M, Løkkegaard E, Bergholt T, Rasmussen SC, Smárason A, et al. Cesarean section trends in the Nordic Countries – a comparative analysis with the Robson classification. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2017;96(5):607-16.
12. Victoria. Capability frameworks for  Victorian maternity and newborn services. Department of Health and Human Services; 2019.
13. Vogel JP, Betran AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, et al. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(5):e260-70.
14. Trinh LTT, Assareh H, Achat H, Chua S, Guevarra V. Caesarean section by country of birth in New South Wales, Australia. Women Birth. 2020;33(1):e72-e8.
15. Lafitte AS, Dolley P, Le Coutour X, Benoist G, Prime L, Thibon P, et al. Rate of caesarean sections according to the Robson classification: Analysis in a French perinatal network - Interest and limitations of the French medico-administrative data (PMSI). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018;47(2):39-44.
16. Johnston T, Leung S, Utz M. Determinants of caesarean section  in Queensland, 2006 to 2015  Statistical Services Branch, Queensland Health2018.
17. Robson M, Murphy M, Byrne F. Quality assurance: The 10-Group Classification System (Robson classification), induction of labor, and cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131 Suppl 1:S23-7.
18. Gerli S, Favilli A, Franchini D, De Giorgi M, Casucci P, Parazzini F. Is the Robson’s classification system burdened by obstetric pathologies, maternal characteristics and assistential levels in comparing hospitals cesarean rates? A regional analysis of class 1 and 3. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2018;31(2):173-7.
19. Kant A, Mendiratta S. Classification of cesarean section through Robson criteria: an emerging concept to audit the increasing cesarean section rate. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018;7:4674.
20. Boatin AA, Cullinane F, Torloni MR, Betran AP. Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review. Bjog. 2018;125(1):36-42.
21. Kacerauskiene J, Bartuseviciene E, Railaite DR, Minkauskiene M, Bartusevicius A, Kliucinskas M, et al. Implementation of the Robson classification in clinical practice:Lithuania’s experience. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):432.