Results
The results of the analysis are presented in two ways: i) in a table format which shows whether each paper explicitly addressed that dimension; and ii) in-text where we provide examples of who was affected and how, and what was proposed to address this.
Analysis of the papers revealed that a large range of equity issues were explicitly recognised and considered across the papers, across all three dimensions (Table 2). Outcome-based/distributive equity issues were the most highly recognised, as were the decision-making-related components of procedural equity. Regarding the context of each paper, there was a substantial recognition of issues relating to the types of knowledge used to address the challenges described (e.g. Western science or Indigenous knowledge), as well as issues relating to agency. Often, the equity problem was not explicitly stated within the papers, but rather recognised through the action pathway identified to move towards a more sustainable 2030. In other words, reducing inequity was interlinked with improving sustainability. For this reason, most of the examples provided in this synthesis will relate to the action pathways identified in the papers.