Mechanical ventilation rates
The rates of mechanical ventilation were not significantly different
between the two treatment arms in the ITT population, although the
nebulised UFH treatment arm showed numerically lower rates of intubation
(ITT population; odds ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.16 – 1.57)(Table 8). For
the MITT and PP populations, the treatment effects reached the
pre-defined level of significance (p<0.1).
Table 7 – Rates of Mechanical ventilation