Cardiovascular Surgery Residency Program during COVID-19 pandemic:
learning opportunities during a crisis
Gustavo Pampolha Guerreiro MD1; Lucas Figueredo
Cardoso MD1; Valdano Manuel MD1;
Aldo David Martinez Benitez MD1; Lucas Fernandes
Bonamigo MD1; Guilherme Visconde Brasil MD
PhD1; Andressa da Silva Elicker MD1;
Alfredo Inácio Fiorelli MD PhD1; Fábio Biscegli Jatene
MD PhD1
1. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Instituto do Coração do
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São
Paulo (InCor-HCFMUSP) - São Paulo, Brazil.
Corresponding author: Gustavo Pampolha Guerreiro - Heart Institute
(Incor), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade
de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, Av. Dr Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 44 –
Pinheiros, Sao Paulo - Brazil.
Email: gustavo_guerreiro@hotmail.com
Telephone: +5511998347107
Conflicts of interest: None declared
Funding: None
Word count: 1813
The development of the residency training system for medical
specialization is credited to Dr. William Halsted after he started the
first formal surgical residency training program in 1889. He believed
that surgical trainees must live in the hospital for much of their
training, allowing them to be truly committed in the learning of
surgical skills and medical knowledge, as they gradually received
increased responsibilities in patients treatment - differently from the
European model for focusing on the resident. One year later, Dr. William
Osler implemented a similar program in internal medicine at Johns
Hopkins Hospital.1
In Brazil, this method was first adopted in the middle 1940’s at the
Hospital das Clínicas of University of São Paulo Medical School with
orthopedics trainees. Just like other new practices at the beginning, it
was not well accepted by the medical community at the time, who thought
this was not necessary to improve academic expertise. In the late
1960’s, following the first “boom” of medical schools in Brazil, the
number of medical residency programs also grew exponentially. Since
then, several institutions were created to improve regulation of these
programs distributed across the country, as the National Association of
Medical Residents (1967) and the National Committee of Medical Residency
(1977). This modality of training has been established as the gold
standard to accomplish the highest expertise in medical specialties,
based on the principle of “training in action” under a senior doctor
supervision.2
Recently an unprecedented situation has come up, which forced both
residents and supervisors to assimilate several changes in the training
routine. In December 2019, the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
emerged in China and spread rapidly around the world, resulting in a
pandemic declared by the World Health Organization in March 2020. The
disease has affected more than 11 million people in Brazil, with more
than 265.000 deaths to date, as we are now facing a second wave of
infections.3,4
Regarding medical assistance and training, it turned out to be a great
challenge, since - among other things - many residents were relocated to
respiratory units to treat patients with COVID-19. The Central Institute
of the Hospital das Clínicas of University of Sao Paulo Medical School
allocated all of its 900 beds for the exclusive treatment of COVID-19,
becoming the largest hospital unit of the Latin America dedicated to
this disease for almost five months. During this period, specific
training in ones specialty was postponed to provide urgent medical care
at the pandemic.5,6
Even though the residency programs situation has become chaotic all
around the world and the activities in almost all specialties nearly
stopped (especially in surgical specialties), the need to reinvent the
way of teaching was the best concern. Along with the imperative of
social distancing measures, the possibilities of “hands-on” training
was not feasible. Also, with the record amount of publications popping
out everyday in an attempt to elucidate COVID-19 pathophysiology and
treatment, the evidence-based medicine practice became even more
necessary. Worldwide the “webinars fever” was an impulse to try new
strategies to fulfill the gaps of knowledge of these future
specialists.7,8,9
In this scenario, the Cardiovascular Surgery Department of Heart
Institute (University of São Paulo Medical School) developed three
modalities to maintain active the residency program:
1. Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery Themes
Theoretical training was already well established in the program,
however the institution’s platform of online learning was still
incipient. O’Doherty et al10 point out that cultural
resistances as well as lack of technical and computer skills amongst
staff may be a barrier to student engagement with technology-based
education, in addition to the extra pressure on the overworked faculty
that have to find sufficient time to manage teaching. Since the major
skills involved in the digital literacy abilities were already
widespread amongst staff and trainees, this adaptation happened quickly,
facilitated by collaborative softwares and video conferencing tools that
became popular during the pandemic. In our experience, it was found that
this new condition has also encouraged the newcomers to question and
study even more due to a more informal environment, which has stimulated
them to be more participative and diminished the gaps among the
residents of different years.
The program content was structured from the basics of potential surgical
patients diagnostic investigation to the surgical treatment and its
implications. Seniors cardiologists and cardiovascular surgeons
performed the lectures based on scientific facts and living experiences.
2. Journal Club
The urgent necessity to better evaluate and judge new evidences in
medicine brought the urgent need to improve the ability of critical
reading and writing scientific papers. With that in mind, it was started
the Journal Club, a versatile tool widely used in medical
education.11 The discussion was based on one article
related to the specialty, previously read by all other residents, and
presented by the junior residents, as if they were presenting in a
scientific meeting, respecting specified time and rules of an academic
discussion. After the presentation, the other colleagues critically
evaluate the article in order to improve judgment on the most read
publications and trending new topics in cardiology and cardiovascular
surgery.
Many authors have already defined some features that are essential for a
journal club, including the participation of all members in the
presentation of papers at one time or another, having a engaged rather
than passive audience and practices that reduce formalities for a more
casual environment.12 These keys points were gradually
implemented in an effort to develop a consistent layout. Furthermore,
changes that were already underway before the pandemic - towards the
transition to an online interaction - were incorporated and contributed
to flexibilize the scheduling of events and allowed more assiduous
joining of participants from different locations at a video conferencing
platform.
3.“Boot Camp”
Since “hands-on” activities were suspended because of social
distancing and based on foreign countries experience with “theory
behind the practice” training, we developed an “Online Surgical Boot
Camp”. Surgical Boot Camps are a common practice in residency programs
\soutall around the world, in which the trainees have its first
contact with the procedures they will learn and later perform in the
routine practice.13,14 As might be expected, it was
not possible to actually perform the procedures, but it made the junior
residents to at least see for the first time the day-by-day procedures
they will be in touch during their career.
From the moment that traditional activities for training basic skills
were temporarily suspended, such as the use of cadavers in practical
classes, concerns are amplified that less time spent learning procedural
skills can lead to a decrease in learner competence. Clearly, this
experience is not the ideal model for a surgical residence program,
whereas surgeons must practice the procedures to improve their surgical
skills. Still, this could be a valuable educational strategy to prepare
trainees’ transition to next stage of their training program.
This experience is easily reproducible in other centers and it meant to
show that we must watch more closely the formation of young surgeons,
especially in times of crisis, like the one we are living during the
COVID-19 pandemic. It is crucial to call to the responsibility put on
medical training institutions to prepare these new professionals
according the principles of evidence-based medicine, surgical
proficiency and patient safety.
References
Fritz T, Stachel N, Braun BJ. Evidence in surgical training - a review.
Innov Surg Sci. 2019 Apr 22;4(1):7-13. doi: 10.1515/iss-2018-0026.
Barbosa, H. A Residência Médica no Brasil. Residência Médica. 1984
Jan/Jun;8(2).
Khan M, Adil SF, Alkhathlan HZ, Tahir MN, Saif S, Khan M, Khan ST.
COVID-19: A Global Challenge with Old History, Epidemiology and Progress
So Far. Molecules. 2020 Dec 23;26(1):39. doi: 10.3390/molecules26010039.
World Health Organization. Weekly operational update on COVID-19 - 8
March 2021. 2021.
https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-operational-update-on-covid-19—8-march-2021.
Accessed 9 March 2021.
Newsome HA, Davies OMT, Doerfer KW. Coronavirus Disease 2019—An
Impetus for Resident Education Reform? JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck
Surg. 2020;146(9):785–786. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2020.1587.
Ostapenko A, McPeck S, Liechty S, Kleiner D. Has COVID-19 Hurt Resident
Education? A Network-Wide Resident Survey on Education and Experience
During the Pandemic. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020 Dec
4;7:2382120520959695. doi: 10.1177/2382120520959695.
Chau KH, Nouri SN, Madhavan MV. Fellowship in the Time of Coronavirus
Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Time to Adapt. JAMA Cardiol.2020;5(7):749–750. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1562.
Ostapenko A, McPeck S, Liechty S, Kleiner D. Impacts on Surgery Resident
Education at a First Wave COVID-19 Epicenter. J Med Educ Curric Dev.
2020 Nov 24;7:2382120520975022. doi: 10.1177/2382120520975022.
Llalle WSC, Bellido-Yarlequé D, Yépez-Calderón C, Chávarry-Infante P.
Impact on the Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Residents’ Learning
Curve During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Oct
29;35(5):856-858. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0300.
O’Doherty D, Dromey M, Lougheed J, Hanningan A, Last J, McGrath D.
Barriers and solutions to online learningin medical education - an
integrative review. BMC Med Educ, 2018;18:130.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1240-0.
Xiong L, Giese AK, Pasi M, Charidimou A, van Veluw S, Viswanathan A. How
to Organize a Journal Club for Fellows and Residents. Stroke. 2018
Sep;49(9):e283-e285. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021728.
Topf JM, Sparks MA, Phelan PJ, Shah N, Lerma EV, Graham-Brown MPM, et
al. The Evolution of the Journal Club: From Osler to Twitter. Am J
Kinder Dis. 2017;69(6):827-836. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.12.012.
Scally CP, Minter RM. Medical School Training for the Surgeon. Surg Clin
North Am. 2016 Feb;96(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2015.08.007.
Blackmore C, Austin J, Lopushinsky SR, Donnon T. Effects of Postgraduate
Medical Education ”Boot Camps” on Clinical Skills, Knowledge, and
Confidence: A Meta-Analysis. J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Dec;6(4):643-52. doi:
10.4300/JGME-D-13-00373.1.