References
1. Mimoun C, Fritel X, Fauconnier A, Deffieux X, Dumont A, Huchon C.
Epidemiology of presumed benign ovarian tumors. J Gynecol Obstet Biol
Reprod. 2013; 42:722-729
2. Kang JH, Kim YS, Lee SH, Kim WY: Comparison of hemostatic sealants on
ovarian reserve during laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. Eur J Obstet
Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015; 194: 64-67
3. Raffi F, Metwally M, Amer S. The impact of excision of ovarian
endometrioma on ovarian reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012; 97: 3146-3154
4. Hong JH, Choi JS, Lee JH, Son CE, Jeon SW, Bae JW. Laparoscopic
management of large ovarian tumors: clinical tips for overcoming common
concerns. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012; 38: 9-15
5. Medeiros LR, Rosa DD, Bozzetti MC et al. Laparoscopy versus
laparotomy for benign ovarian tumour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;
15: CD004751
6. Chang HJ, Han SH, Lee JR et al. Impact of laparoscopic cystectomy on
ovarian reserve: serial changes of serum anti-Müllerian hormone. Fertil
Steril. 2010; 94: 343-349
7. Iwase A, Hirokawa W, Goto M et al. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone level
is a useful marker for evaluating the impact of laparoscopic cystectomy
on ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: 2846-2849
8. Kitajima M, Khan KN, Hiraki K, Inoue T, Fujishita A, Masuzaki H:
Changes in serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels may predict damage to
residual normal ovarian tissue after laparoscopic surgery for women with
ovarian endometrioma. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95: 2589-2591
9. Celik HG, Dogan E, Okyay E et al. Effect of laparospopic excision of
endometriomas on ovarian reserve: serial changes in the serum
antimüllerian hormone levels. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97: 1472-1478
10. Mereu L, Angioni S, Melis GB, Mencaglia L. Single access laparoscopy
for adnexal pathologies using a novel reusable port and curved
instruments. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010; 109: 78-80
11. Jung YW, Choi YM, Chung CK et al. Single port transumbilical
laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions: a single center experience in
Korea. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011; 155: 221-224
12. Escobar PF, Bedaiwy MA, Fader AN, Falcone T. Laparoendoscopic
single-site (LESS) surgery in patients with benign adnexal disease.
Fertil Steril. 2010; 93: 2074.e7-10
13. Yoon BS, Kim YS, Seong SJ et al. Impact on ovarian reserve after
laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy with reduced port number: a randomized
controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014; 176: 34-8
14. Huang BS, Wang PH, Tsai HW, Hsu TF, Yen MS, Chen YJ. Single-port
compared with conventional laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian dermoid
cysts. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol.2014; 53: 523-529
15. Wang D, Liu H, Li D et al. Comparison of the impact of single-port
laparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy on the
ovarian reserve in adult patients with benign ovarian cysts. Minim
Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2019; 1: 1-8
16. Angioni S, Pontis A, Cela V, Sedda F, Genazzani AD, Nappi. Surgical
technique of endometrioma excision impacts on the ovarian reserve.
Single-port access laparoscopy versus multiport access laparoscopy: a
case control study. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015; 31: 454-457
17. Alammari R, Lightfoot M, Hur HC. Impact of Cystectomy on Ovarian
Reserve: Review of the Literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017; 24:
247-257
18. Yuh-Ming Hwu, Frank Shao-Ying Wu, Sheng-Hsiang Li, Fang-Ju Sun,
Ming-Huei Lin, Robert Kuo-Kuang Lee. The impact of endometrioma and
laparoscopic cystectomy on serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels. Reprod
Biol Endocrinol. 2011; 9: 80
19. DerSimonian R, Kacker R. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of
clinical trials: an update. Contemp Clin Trial .2007; 28: 105–114
20. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance
from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol.
2005; 5:13
21. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data
from Retrospective Studies of Disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959; 22:
719-748
22. Hirokawa W, Iwase A, Goto M et al. The post-operative decline in
serum anti-Mullerian hormone correlates with the bilaterality and
severity of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2011;26: 904-910
23. Muzii, L, Bellati, F, Bianchi, A et al. Laparoscopic stripping of
endometriomas: a randomized trial on different surgical techniques. Hum
Reprod. 2005; 20: 1987-1992 24. Muzii L, Di Tucci C, Di Feliciantonio M
et al. Antimüllerian hormone is reduced in the presence of ovarian
endometriomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility and
Sterility. 2018; 110: 932–940.e1
25. Paek J, Nam EJ, Kim YT, Kim SW. Overcoming technical difficulties
with single-port access laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: using
conventional laparoscopic instruments. Journal of Laparoendoscip and
Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2011; 21: 137-141
26. Iwase A, Nakamura T, Nakahara T, Goto M, Kikkawa F. Assessment of
ovarian reserve using anti-Müllerian hormone levels in benign
gynecologic conditions and surgical interventions: a systematic
narrative review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014; 12: 125
27. Hwu YM, Wu FS, Li SH, Sun FJ, Lin MH, Lee LK. The impact of
endometrioma and laparoscopic cystectomy on serum anti-Müllerian hormone
levels. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011; 9: 80
28. Tsolakidis D, Pados G, Vavilis D et al. The impact on ovarian
reserve after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy versus three-stage
management in patients with endometriomas: a prospective randomized
study. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: 71–77
29. Roudebush WE, Kivens WJ, Mattke JM. Biomarkers of Ovarian Reserve.
Biomark Insights 2008; 3: 259–268
30. Tremellen KP, Kolo M, Gilmore A, Lekamge DN. Anti-mullerian hormone
as a marker of ovarian reserve. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005; 45:
20-24
31. Jamil Ζ, Fatima SS,Ahmed K, Malik R. Anti-Mullerian Hormone. Above
and Beyond Conventional Ovarian Reserve Markers. Dis Markers. 2016;
2016: 5246217