Angelos Amyntas

and 13 more

Emilio Berti

and 3 more

The movement of animals affects the biodiversity, ecological processes, and resilience of an ecosystem. For the animals, moving has costs as well as benefits and the use of a given landscape provides insights into animal decisions and behavioral ecology. Understanding how animals use the landscape can thus clarify their effects on ecosystems and inform conservation measures aiming at preserving and restoring the ecological functions of animal dispersal. Here, we investigated the habitat preferences of African savanna elephants (Loxodonta africana) using GPS data from 155 individuals collected between 1998 and 2020 in Northern Kenya. In particular, we assessed how “energy landscapes”, i.e. the cost of locomotion due to the slope of the terrain and the animal body mass, together with elevation, vegetation productivity, water availability, and proximity to human settlements influence the habitat preferences of elephants. We found that the energy landscape is the most consistent predictor of elephants’ preferences, with individuals generally avoiding energetically costly areas and preferring highly productive habitats. We also found that other predictors such as elevation, water availability and human presence, are important in determining habitat usage, but varied greatly among elephants, with some individuals preferring habitats avoided by others. Our analysis highlights the importance of the energy landscape as a key driver of habitat preferences of elephants. Importantly, the enerscape modeling environment allowed us to develop testable hypotheses from rather coarse-grained data covering elephant movements and a few environmental parameters. Energy landscapes rely on fundamental biomechanical and physical principles and provide a mechanistic understanding of the observed preference patterns, allowing to disentangle key causal drivers of an animal’s preferences from correlational effects. This, in turn, has important implications for assessing and planning conservation and restoration measures, such as dispersal corridors, by explicitly accounting for the energy costs of moving.

Angelos Amyntas

and 7 more

1.     Species-rich communities exhibit higher levels of ecosystem functioning compared to species-poor ones, and this positive relationship strengthens over time. One proposed explanation for this phenomenon is the reduction of niche overlap among plants or animals, which corresponds to increased complementarity and reduced competition. 2.     In order to examine the potential of increased complementarity among plants or animals to strengthen the relationship between diversity and ecosystem functions, we integrated models of bio-energetic population dynamics and food-web assembly. Through the simulation of various scenarios of plant and animal complementarity change, we sought to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the observed increases in (1) primary productivity, (2) control of herbivores by predators, and (3) reduction of herbivore pressure on plants in species-rich communities.3.     Our findings reveal that increased niche complementarity of plants can steepen the diversity-function relationships if it does not increase their intraspecific competition, while increasing complementarity among animals during community assembly can also have a positive effect but with considerable variability. 4.     The study highlights the importance of trait variation both among and within species, and the interplay between intra- and interspecific competition strength in shaping the functioning of ecosystems over time. These results offer insights into the mechanisms underpinning the diversity-functioning relationship, and have practical implications for ecosystem management and conservation efforts.

Malte Jochum

and 6 more

Global change alters ecological communities with consequences for ecosystem processes. Such processes and functions are a central aspect of ecological research and vital to understanding and mitigating the consequences of global change, but also those of other drivers of change in organism communities. In this context, the concept of energy flux through trophic networks integrates food-web theory and biodiversity-ecosystem functioning theory and connects biodiversity to multitrophic ecosystem functioning. As such, the energy flux approach is a strikingly effective tool to answer central questions in ecology and global-change research. This might seem straight forward, given that the theoretical background and software to efficiently calculate energy flux are readily available. However, the implementation of such calculations is not always straight forward, especially for those who are new to the topic and not familiar with concepts central to this line of research, such as food-web theory or metabolic theory. To facilitate wider use of energy flux in ecological research, we thus provide a guide to adopting energy-flux calculations for people new to the method, struggling with its implementation, or simply looking for background reading, important resources, and standard solutions to the problems everyone faces when starting to quantify energy fluxes for their community data. First, we introduce energy flux and its use in community and ecosystem ecology. Then, we provide a comprehensive explanation of the single steps towards calculating energy flux for community data. Finally, we discuss remaining challenges and exciting research frontiers for future energy-flux research.

Jori Marx

and 3 more

Global change drivers like warming and changing nutrient cycles have a substantial impact on ecosystem functioning. In most modelling studies, organism responses to warming are described through the temperature dependence of their biological rates. In nature, however, organisms are more than their biological rates. Plants are flexible in their elemental composition (stoichiometry) and respond to variance in nutrient availability and temperature. An increase in plant carbon-to-nutrient content means a decrease in food quality for herbivores. Herbivores can react to this decrease by compensatory feeding, which implies higher feeding rates and higher carbon excretion to optimize nutrient acquisition. In a novel model of a nutrient-plant-herbivore system, we explored the consequences of flexible stoichiometry and compensatory feeding for plant and herbivore biomass production and survival across gradients in temperature and nutrient availability. We found that flexible stoichiometry increases plant and herbivore biomasses, which results from increased food availability due to higher plant growth. Surprisingly, compensatory feeding decreased plant and herbivore biomasses as overfeeding by the herbivore reduced plants to low densities and depleted their resource. Across a temperature gradient, compensatory feeding caused herbivore extinction at a lower temperature, while flexible stoichiometry increased its extinction threshold. Our results suggest that compensatory feeding can become critical under warm conditions. In contrast, flexible stoichiometry is beneficial for plants up to a certain temperature threshold. These findings demonstrate the importance of accounting for adaptive and behavioural organismal responses to nutrient and temperature gradients when predicting the consequences of warming and eutrophication for population dynamics and survival.