References
1. Roberts WC, Ko JM. Frequency by Decades of Unicuspid, Bicuspid, and Tricuspid Aortic Valves in Adults Having Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis, With or Without Associated Aortic Regurgitation. Circulation [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2019 May 20];111:920–925. Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.CIR.0000155623.48408.C5
2. Huntley GD, Thaden JJ, Alsidawi S, Michelena HI, Maleszewski JJ, Edwards WD, Scott CG, Pislaru SV, Pellikka PA, Greason KL, Ammash NM, Malouf JF, Enriquez-Sarano M, Nkomo VT. Comparative study of bicuspid vs. tricuspid aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J - Cardiovasc Imaging [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 May 20];19:3–8. Available from: http://academic.oup.com/ehjcimaging/article/19/1/3/4318806
3. Shen M, Tastet L, Capoulade R, Arsenault M, Bédard É, Clavel M-A, Pibarot P. Effect of bicuspid aortic valve phenotype on progression of aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J - Cardiovasc Imaging [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 26];21:727–734. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/ehjcimaging/article/21/7/727/5835256
4. Choi BH, Ko SM, Shin JK, Chee HK, Kim JS, Kim J. Association between aortic valvular calcification and characteristics of the aortic valve in patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. Acta Radiol[Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 8];60:468–477. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185118787359
5. Bahler RC, Desser DR, Finkelhor RS, Brener SJ, Youssefi M. Factors leading to progression of valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol[Internet]. 1999 [cited 2019 Aug 12];84:1044–1048. Available from: https://www.ajconline.org/article/S0002-9149(99)00496-8/abstract
6. Yousry M, Rickenlund A, Petrini J, Jenner J, Liska J, Eriksson P, Franco-Cereceda A, Eriksson MJ, Caidahl K. Aortic valve type and calcification as assessed by transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2019 May 20];35:306–313. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/cpf.12166
7. Freeman RV, Otto CM. Spectrum of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease: Pathogenesis, Disease Progression, and Treatment Strategies.Circulation [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2019 May 20];111:3316–3326. Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.486738
8. Yap S-C, Kouwenhoven GC, Takkenberg JJM, Galema TW, Meijboom FJ, van Domburg R, Simoons ML, Roos-Hesselink JW. Congenital aortic stenosis in adults: Rate of progression and predictors of clinical outcome.Int J Cardiol [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2020 Jun 28];122:224–231. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167527307000332
9. van der Linde D, Andrinopoulou E-R, Oechslin EN, Budts W, van Dijk APJ, Pieper PG, Wajon EMCJ, Post MC, Witsenburg M, Silversides CK, Oxenius A, Bogers AJJC, Takkenberg JJM, Roos-Hesselink JW. Congenital valvular aortic stenosis in young adults: Predictors for rate of progression of stenosis and aortic dilatation. Int J Cardiol[Internet]. 2013 [cited 2020 Jun 28];168:863–870. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167527312014027
10. Beppu S, Suzuki S, Matsuda H, Ohmori F, Nagata S, Miyatake K. Rapidity of progression of aortic stenosis in patients with congenital bicuspid aortic valves. Am J Cardiol [Internet]. 1993 [cited 2019 Nov 8];71:322–327. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/000291499390799I
11. Sia C-H, Ho JS-Y, Chua JJ-L, Tan BY-Q, Ngiam NJ, Chew N, Sim H-W, Chen R, Lee C-H, Yeo T-C, Kong WK-F, Poh K-K. Comparison of Clinical and Echocardiographic Features of Asymptomatic Patients With Stenotic Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves. Am J Cardiol[Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 28];Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914920304835
12. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Guyton RA, O’Gara PT, Ruiz CE, Skubas NJ, Sorajja P, Sundt TM 3rd, Thomas JD, Members AATF. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation [Internet]. 2014;129:2440–92. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24589852
13. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Fleisher LA, Jneid H, Mack MJ, McLeod CJ, O’Gara PT, Rigolin VH, Sundt TM 3rd, Thompson A. 2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation[Internet]. 2017;135:e1159–e1195. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298458
14. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Evangelista A, Griffin BP, Iung B, Otto CM, Pellikka PA, Quinones M, Eae/Ase. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr [Internet]. 2009;10:1–25. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19065003
15. Schaefer BM, Lewin MB, Stout KK, Gill E, Prueitt A, Byers PH, Otto CM. The bicuspid aortic valve: an integrated phenotypic classification of leaflet morphology and aortic root shape. Heart[Internet]. 2008;94:1634–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18308868
16. Carrero MC, Díaz Babio GR, Masson Juárez G, Constantin I, Verón F, Mezzadra MDC, Vera Janavel G, Stutzbach PG. Mechanisms of Dysfunction and Prognostic Markers in Bicuspid Aortic Valve. Argent J Cardiol[Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Jun 28];87:109-117–117. Available from: http://ppct.caicyt.gov.ar/index.php/rac/article/view/14512
17. Namasivayam M, Dal-Bianco JP. Progression of aortic stenosis with bicuspid aortic valves: evidence and intuition. Eur Heart J - Cardiovasc Imaging [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 28];21:735–736. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/ehjcimaging/article/21/7/735/5860546
Table 1 - Baseline characteristics of the patients with aortic stenosis according to valve phenotype (bicuspid aortic valve or tricuspid aortic valve).