REFERENCES
- Wang DD, Caranasos T, O’Neill B, Stack R, O’Niell W, Chitwood Jr WR.
Comparison of a new bioprosthetic mitral valve to other commercially
available devices under controlled conditions in a porcine model.
Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 2021 Sep. (In Press)
- Bothe W, Miller DC, Doenst T. Sizing for mitral annuloplasty: where
does science stop and voodoo begin?. The Annals of thoracic surgery.
2013 Apr 1;95(4):1475-83.
- Stone GW, Adams DH, Abraham WT, et al. Clinical Trial Design
Principles and Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Mitral Valve
Repair and Replacement: Part 2: Endpoint Definitions: A Consensus
Document From the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 2015;66:308-321.
- Girdauskas E, Pausch J, Harmel E, Gross T, Detter C, Sinning C, Kubitz
J, Reichenspurner H. Minimally invasive mitral valve repair for
functional mitral regurgitation. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic
Surgery. 2019 Jun 1;55(Supplement_1):i17-25.
- Doenst T, Amorim PA, Al-Alam N, Lehmann S, Mukherjee C, Faerber G.
Where is the common sense in aortic valve replacement? A review of
hemodynamics and sizing of stented tissue valves. The Journal of
thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2011 Nov 1;142(5):1180-7.
- Value of augmented reality-enhanced transesophageal echocardiography
(TEE) for determining optimal annuloplasty ring size during mitral
valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008; 86 : 1473-1478
- Mitral valve finite-element modelling from ultrasound data: a pilot
study for a new approach to understand mitral function and clinical
scenarios. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng
Sci. 2008; 366 : 3411-3434