References

1. Shah TT, Gao C, Peters M, et al. Factors Associated with Spontaneous Stone Passage in a Contemporary Cohort of Patients Presenting with Acute Ureteric Colic: Results from the Multi-Centre Cohort Study Evaluating the Role of Inflammatory Markers In Patients Presenting with Acute Ureteric Colic (MIMIC) Study. BJU Int. 2019; 124(3): 504–513.
2. Caniklioğlu M, Öztekin Ü, Sari S, et al. Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi’nde Endoskopik Taş Cerrahisi Deneyimimiz. Bozok Med. J. 2020; 10(2): 95–9.
3. Yencilek F, Sarica K, Erturhan S, Yagci F, Erbagci A. Treatment of Ureteral Calculi with Semirigid Ureteroscopy: Where Should We Stop?Urol. Int. 2010; 84(3): 260–264.
4. Kartal I, Yalçınkaya F, Baylan B, et al. Comparison of Semirigid Ureteroscopy, Flexible Ureteroscopy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Initial Treatment of 11-20 Mm Proximal Ureteral Stones. Arch. Ital. Di Urol. e Androl. 2020; 92(1): 39–44.
5. Galal EM, Anwar AZ, Fath El-Bab TK, Abdelhamid AM. Retrospective Comparative Study of Rigid and Flexible Ureteroscopy for Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones. Int. Braz J Urol . 2016; 42(5): 967–972.
6. Zhou R, Han C, Hao L, et al. Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy in the Trendelenburg Position for Extracting Obstructive Upper Ureteral Obstruction Stones: A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Trial.Scand. J. Urol. 2018; 52(4): 291–295.
7. Saussine C, Andonian S, Pacík D, et al. Worldwide Use of Antiretropulsive Techniques: Observations from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study. J. Endourol. 2018; 32(4): 297–303.
8. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal with Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey. Ann. Surg. 2004; 240(2): 205–213.
9. Sun Y, Wang L, Liao G, et al. Pneumatic Lithotripsy versus Laser Lithotripsy in the Endoscopic Treatment of Ureteral Calculi. In:. J. Endourol., vol. 15. Mary Ann Liebert Inc. 2001; 587–590.
10. Knispel HH, Klän R, Heicappell R, Miller K. Pneumatic Lithotripsy Applied through Deflected Working Channel of Miniureteroscope: Results in 143 Patients. J. Endourol. 1998; 12(6): 513–515.
11. Patel RM, Walia AS, Grohs E, et al. Effect of Positioning on Ureteric Stone Retropulsion: ‘Gravity Works.’ BJU Int. 2019; 123(1): 113–117.
12. Zehri AA, Ather MH, Siddiqui KM, Sulaiman MN. A Randomized Clinical Trial of Lidocaine Jelly for Prevention of Inadvertent Retrograde Stone Migration During Pneumatic Lithotripsy of Ureteral Stone. J. Urol. 2008; 180(3): 966–968.
13. Dretler SP. Ureteroscopy for Proximal Ureteral Calculi: Prevention of Stone Migration. J. Endourol. 2000; 14(7): 565–567.
14. Dretler SP. The Stone Cone: A New Generation of Basketry. J. Urol. 2001; 165(5 I): 1593–1596.
15. Wang CJ, Huang SW, Chang CH. Randomized Trial of NTrap for Proximal Ureteral Stones. Urology . 2011; 77(3): 553–557.
16. Mirabile G, Phillips CK, Edelstein A, et al. Evaluation of a Novel Temperature-Sensitive Polymer for Temporary Ureteral Occlusion. In:. J. Endourol., vol. 22. J Endourol 2008; 2357–2359.
17. Gonen M, Cenker A, Istanbulluoglu O, Ozkardes H. Efficacy of Dretler Stone Cone in the Treatment of Ureteral Stones with Pneumatic Lithotripsy. Urol. Int. 2006; 76(2): 159–162.
18. Sen H, Bayrak O, Erturhan S, et al. Comparing of Different Methods for Prevention Stone Migration during Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.Urol. Int. 2014; 92(3): 334–338.
19. Rehman J, Monga M, Landman J, et al. Characterization of Intrapelvic Pressure during Ureteropyeloscopy with Ureteral Access Sheaths.Urology . 2003; 61(4): 713–718.
20. Auge BK, Pietrow PK, Lallas CD, et al. Ureteral Access Sheath Provides Protection against Elevated Renal Pressures during Routine Flexible Ureteroscopic Stone Manipulation. J. Endourol. 2004; 18(1): 33–36.
21. Yang B, Ning H, Liu Z, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscopy in Combination with Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Bilateral Upper Urinary Tract Calculi. Urol. Int.2017; 98(4): 418–424.
22. Öztekin Ü, Erkoç F, Sarı S, et al. The Effect of Ureterorenoscopy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Procedures on Renovascular Hemodynamics. Ann. Clin. Anal. Med. 2020; 11(4): 272–276.
23. Karadag MA, Demir A, Cecen K, et al. Flexible Ureterorenoscopy versus Semirigid Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of 124 Patients.Urol. J. 2013; 11(5): 1867–1872.
24. Özkaya F, Sertkaya Z, Karabulut I, Aksoy Y. The Effect of Using Ureteral Access Sheath for Treatment of Impacted Ureteral Stones at Mid-Upper Part with Flexible Ureterorenoscopy: A Randomized Prospective Study. Minerva Urol. e Nefrol. 2019; 71(4): 413–420.
25. Cabrera FJ, Preminger GM, Lipkin ME. Antiretropulsion Devices.Curr. Opin. Urol. 2014; 24(2): 173–178.
26. Pan J, Xue W, Xia L, et al. Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy in Trendelenburg Position for Proximal Ureteral Calculi: A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2014; 46(10): 1895–1901.
27. Xu C, Song RJ, Jiang MJ, et al. Flexible Ureteroscopy with Holmium Laser Lithotripsy: A New Choice for Intrarenal Stone Patients.Urol. Int. 2015; 94(1): 93–98.