Fig. S9. Shifts in peak elevation (cm) and abundance (fold change) for
the 46 taxa we modelled with HMSC, arranged by functional group and then
individual trends in occurrence. Points are median shifts across 1,000
posterior samples (shown in Figure 2C), and errors bars are 50% (thick
bars) and 95% CIs (thin bars). We constrained our predictions to the
surveyed elevation range (61 to 382 cm above MLLWLT), creating a few
situations where upper 95% credible limits for peak elevation shifts
were exactly zero (e.g., Egregia menziesii , Ulva ,Halosaccion glandiforme ). We do not consider these shifts to be
significantly different from zero. Taxa are arranged from the greatest
cover loss over time to greatest cover increases, first by functional
group (colors as in Fig. 2) and then by taxa within functional groups.