Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest All authors have no conflict of interest
to declare.
Ethical approval All procedures performed in studies involving
human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the
Institutional Review Board of the Einstein Healthcare Network and with
the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable
ethical standards.
Informed consent Informed consent was obtained from all
individual participants included in the study.
Reference
1.
Sarris GE, Polimenakos
AC.Three-Dimensional Modeling in
Congenital and Structural Heart Perioperative Care and Education: A Path
in Evolution. Pediatr Cardiol 2017;38:883-885.
2. Mowers KL, Fullerton JB, Hicks D, et al. 3D Echocardiography Provides
Highly Accurate 3D Printed Models in Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatr
Cardiol 2021;42:131-141.
3.
Loke YH, Harahsheh AS, Krieger A, et al. Usage of 3D models of tetralogy
of Fallot for medical education: impact on learning congenital heart
disease. BMC Med Educ 2017; 17:54.
4.
Ghisiawan N, Herbert CE, Zussman M, et al. The use of a
three-dimensional print model of an aortic arch to plan a complex
percutaneous intervention in a patient with coarctation of the aorta.
Cardiol Young 2016;26: 1568-1572.
5.
Bhatla P, Tretter JT, Ludomirsky A, et al. Utility and Scope of Rapid
Prototyping in Patients with Complex Muscular Ventricular Septal Defects
or Double-Outlet Right Ventricle: Does it Alter Management Decisions?
Pediatr Cardiol 2017; 38: 103-114.
6.
Byrne
N, Velasco FM, Tandon A, et al. A systematic review of image
segmentation methodology, used in the additive manufacture of
patient-specific 3D printed models of the cardiovascular system. JRSM
Cardiovasc Dis 2016; 5:401155419.
7.
Faganello G, Campana C, Belgrano M, et al. Three dimensional printing of
an atrial septal defect: Is it multimodality imaging? Int J Cardiovasc
Imaging 2016;
8. Vukicevic M, Faza NN, Avenatti E, et al. Patient-Specific
3-Dimensional Printed Modeling of the Tricuspid Valve for MitraClip
Procedure Planning. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging 2020;13:
e010376.
9. Luo H, Xu Y, Wang Z, Liu Y, et al. Three-Dimensional Printing
Model-Guided Percutaneous Closure of Atrial Septal Defect. Arq
Bras Cardiol 2017;108:484-485.
10.
Mathur M, Patil P, Bove A. The Role of 3D Printing in Structural Heart
Disease: All That Glitters Is Not Gold. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; 8:
987-988.
11.
Muraru D, Veronesi F, Maddalozzo A, et al. 3D printing of normal and
pathologic tricuspid valves from transthoracic 3D echocardiography data
sets. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;18:802-808.
12. Dan Jia, Qing Zhou, Hong-ning Song, et al. The value of the left
atrial appendage orifice perimeter of 3D model based on 3D TEE data in
the choice of device size of LAmbre⢠occlude. The International Journal
of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2019;35:1841-1851.
13.
Hascoet S, Hadeed K, Marchal P, et al.The relation between atrial septal
defect shape, diameter, and area using three-dimensional
transoesophageal echocardiography and balloon sizing during percutaneous
closure in children. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;16:747-755.
14. Turner DR, Owada CY, Sang CJ, et al. Closure of Secundum Atrial
Septal Defects With the AMPLATZER Septal Occluder: A Prospective,
Multicenter, Post-Approval Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv
2017;10:e004212.
15.
Smerling J, Marboe CC, Lefkowitch JH, et al. Utility of 3D Printed
Cardiac Models for Medical Student Education in Congenital Heart
Disease: Across a Spectrum of Disease Severity. Pediatr Cardiol 2019;
40:1258-1265.
16. Zhu Y, Liu J, Wang L, Guan X, et al. Preliminary study of the
application of transthoracic echocardiography-guided three-dimensional
printing for the assessment of structural heart disease.
Echocardiography 2017;34:1903-1908.
17. Ma Y, Ding P, Li L, et al.Three-dimensional printing for heart
diseases: clinical application review. Biodes Manuf 2021:1-13.
18. He
L, Cheng GS, Du YJ, et al. Feasibility of Device Closure for Multiple
Atrial Septal Defects With an Inferior Sinus Venosus Defect: Procedural
Planning Using Three-Dimensional Printed Models. Heart Lung Circ
2020;29:914-920.
19. Mashari A, Montealegre-Gallegos M, Knio Z, et al. Making
three-dimensional echocardiography more tangible: a workflow for
three-dimensional printing with echocardiographic data. Echo Res Pract
2016;3:R57-64.
20. Nakayama R, Takaya Y, Akagi T, et al. Efficacy and safety of atrial
septal defect closure using Occlutech Figulla Flex II compared with
Amplatzer Septal Occluder. Heart Vessels 2021;36:704-709.
21. Kitakata H, Itabashi Y, Kanazawa H, et al. Appropriate device
selection for transcatheter atrial septal defect closure using
three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc
Imaging 2021;37:1159-1168.
22.
Boon I, Vertongen K, Paelinck BP, et al. How to Size ASDs for
Percutaneous Closure. Pediatr Cardiol 2018;39: 168-175.
23. Jang JY, Heo R, Cho MS, et al.Efficacy of 3D transoesophageal
echocardiography for transcatheter device closure of atrial septal
defect without balloon sizing. European Heart Journal -
Cardiovascular Imaging 2018;19:684-689.
24.
Meier LM, Meineri M, Qua HJ, et al. Structural and congenital heart
disease interventions: the role of three-dimensional printing.Neth Heart J 2017;25:65-75.
25. Sa
YK, Park CS, Cho EJ, et al. Single device transcatheter closure for
double atrial septal defect under real time three-dimensional image
guidanceĀ [published online ahead of print Jul 15 ,2021]. The Korean
Journal of Internal Medicine. doi:
10.3904/kjim.2021.094.
26. Yan C, Wang C, Pan X, et al.Three-dimensional printing assisted
transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect with deficient
posterior-inferior rim. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
2018;92:1309-1314.