REFERENCES
1. Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, et
al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.
The Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341-8.
2. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections
of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob
Health. 2021;6(6).
3. Betrán AP, Temmerman M, Kingdon C, Mohiddin A, Opiyo N, Torloni MR,
et al. Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy
women and babies. The Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1358-68.
4. Betrán AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Section WHOWGoC. WHO
Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. BJOG. 2016;123(5):667-70.
5. Visser GHA, Ayres-de-Campos D, Barnea ER, de Bernis L, Di Renzo GC,
Vidarte MFE, et al. FIGO position paper: how to stop the caesarean
section epidemic. The Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1286-7.
6. Kallianidis AF, Schutte JM, van Roosmalen J, van den Akker T.
Maternal mortality after cesarean section in the Netherlands. Eur J
Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;229:148-52.
7. Bjellmo S, Andersen GL, Hjelle S, Klungsoyr K, Krebs L, Lydersen S,
et al. Does caesarean delivery in the first pregnancy increase the risk
for adverse outcome in the second? A registry-based cohort study on
first and second singleton births in Norway. BMJ Open.
2020;10(8):e037717.
8. Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, Ciapponi A, Colaci D, Comandé D, et
al. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway
towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. The Lancet.
2016;388(10056):2176-92.
9. RCOG Green-top Guideline: Birth after previous caesarean birth.
2015;45.
10. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean
Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):e110-e27.
11. NVOG. Zwangerschap en bevalling na een voorgaande sectio caesarea.
2010.
12. Guise JM, Denman MA, Emeis C, Marshall N, Walker M, Fu R, et al.
Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal
outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(6):1267-78.
13. Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer CS, et al.
Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of
women and children. The Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1349-57.
14. Vandenberghe G, Bloemenkamp K, Berlage S, Colmorn L, Deneux-Tharaux
C, Gissler M, et al. The International Network of Obstetric Survey
Systems study of uterine rupture: a descriptive multi-country
population-based study. BJOG. 2019;126(3):370-81.
15. Tahseen S, Griffiths M. Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections
(VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and
adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1 and repeat (third) caesarean
sections. BJOG. 2010;117(1):5-19.
16. Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Bruinse HW. Uterine rupture and its
complications in the Netherlands: a prospective study. Eur J Obstet
Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;128(1-2):257-61.
17. Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA, et al.
Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries.
Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1226-32.
18. van Dillen J, Zwart JJ, Schutte J, Bloemenkamp KW, van Roosmalen J.
Severe acute maternal morbidity and mode of delivery in the Netherlands.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(11):1460-5.
19. Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Ory F, de Vries JI, Bloemenkamp KW, van
Roosmalen J. Severe maternal morbidity during pregnancy, delivery and
puerperium in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based study of
371,000 pregnancies. BJOG. 2008;115(7):842-50.
20. Thurn L, Lindqvist PG, Jakobsson M, Colmorn LB, Klungsoyr K,
Bjarnadottir RI, et al. Abnormally invasive placenta-prevalence, risk
factors and antenatal suspicion: results from a large population-based
pregnancy cohort study in the Nordic countries. BJOG.
2016;123(8):1348-55.
21. Euro-Peristat N. European Perinatal Health Report. Core indicators
of the health and care of pregnany women and babies in Europe in 2015.
www.europeristat.com; 2018.
22. Zeitlin J, Durox M, Macfarlane A, Alexander S, Heller G, Loghi M, et
al. Using Robson’s Ten-Group Classification System for comparing
caesarean section rates in Europe: an analysis of routine data from the
Euro-Peristat study. BJOG. 2021;128(9):1444-53.
23. Schoorel EN, Melman S, van Kuijk SM, Grobman WA, Kwee A, Mol BW, et
al. Predicting successful intended vaginal delivery after previous
caesarean section: external validation of two predictive models in a
Dutch nationwide registration-based cohort with a high intended vaginal
delivery rate. BJOG. 2014;121(7):840-7; discussion 7.
24. Perined. Unpublished data.
25. Robson M, Murphy M, Byrne F. Quality assurance: The 10-Group
Classification System (Robson classification), induction of labor, and
cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131 Suppl 1:S23-7.
26. Robson MS. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal and Maternal
Medicine Review. 2001;12(1):23-39.
27. Perined. Jaarboeken perinatale zorg in Nederland.
28. Perined. Perinatale zorg in Nederland anno 2019. 2020.
29. Perined. Stichting Perinatale Registratie Nederland Grote Lijnen
1999-2012. Utrecht: Stichting Perinatale Registratie Nederland; 2013.
30. Tromp M, Ravelli AC, Meray N, Reitsma JB, Bonsel GJ. An efficient
validation method of probabilistic record linkage including readmissions
and twins. Methods Inf Med. 2008;47(4):356-63.
31. Meray N, Reitsma JB, Ravelli AC, Bonsel GJ. Probabilistic record
linkage is a valid and transparent tool to combine databases without a
patient identification number. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(9):883-91.
32. Team RC. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. .
Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.
33. Euro-Peristat N. European perinatal health report
www.europeristat.com; 2008.
34. OECD. Health care utilisation - Surgical Procedures - Caesarean
sections per 1000 live births https://stats.oecd.org/2022
35. Vikhareva O, Nedopekina E, Kristensen K, Dahlback C, Pihlsgard M,
Rickle GS, et al. Strategies to increase the rate of vaginal deliveries
after cesarean without negative impact on outcomes. Midwifery.
2022;106:103247.
36. Fobelets M, Beeckman K, Faron G, Daly D, Begley C, Putman K. Vaginal
birth after caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean delivery after
one previous caesarean section: a cost-effectiveness analysis in four
European countries. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):92.
37. Fawsitt CG, Bourke J, Greene RA, Everard CM, Murphy A, Lutomski JE.
At what price? A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing trial of labour
after previous caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean delivery. PLoS
One. 2013;8(3):e58577.
38. Hoftiezer L, Hukkelhoven CW, Hogeveen M, Straatman HM, van Lingen
RA. Defining small-for-gestational-age: prescriptive versus descriptive
birthweight standards. Eur J Pediatr. 2016;175(8):1047-57.
39. Hoftiezer L, Hof MHP, Dijs-Elsinga J, Hogeveen M, Hukkelhoven C, van
Lingen RA. From population reference to national standard: new and
improved birthweight charts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(4):383 e1-
e17.
40. Executive summary: Neonatal encephalopathy and neurologic outcome,
second edition. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists’ Task Force on Neonatal Encephalopathy. Obstet Gynecol.
2014;123(4):896-901.