References
[1]. Yang T, Wu X, Peng X, Zhang Y, Xie S, Sun H. Comparison of cartilage graft and fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Otolaryngol. 2016;136(11):1085–90.
[2]. Lyons SA, Su T, Vissers LET, Peters JPM, Smit AL, Grolman W. Fascia compared to one-piece composite cartilage-perichondrium grafting for tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(7):1662–70.
[3]. Tos M. Cartilage tympanoplasty methods: Proposal of a classification. Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2008;139(6):747–58. Doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.09.021
[4]. Dündar R, Soy FK, Kulduk E, Muluk NB, Cingi C. A new grafting technique for tympanoplasty : tympanoplasty with a boomerang-shaped chondroperichondrial graft ( TwBSCPG ). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Oct;271(10):2687-94. Doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2764-x.
[5]. Ciğer E, Balcı MK, İşlek A, Önal K. The wheel-shaped composite cartilage graft ( WsCCG ) and temporalis fascia for type 1 tympanoplasty : a prospective , randomized study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 ;275(12):2975-2981. Doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5171-5
[6]. Yung M. Cartilage tympanoplasty: Literature review. J Laryngol Otol. 2008;122(7):663–72.
[7]. Dornhoffer J. Cartilage Tympanoplasty : Indications , Techniques , And Outcomes In A 1,000- Patient Series. Laryngoscope. 2003 Nov;113(11):1844-56.
[8]. Heermann JJ, Heermann H, Kopstein E. Fascia and cartilage palisade tympanoplasty. Nine years’ experience. Arch Otolaryngol. 1970;91:228–41.
[9]. Khan MM, Parab SR. Comparative study of sliced tragal cartilage and temporalis fascia in type I tympanoplasty. J Laryngol Otol. 2015;129:16–22.
[10]. Velepic M, Starcevic R, Ticac R, Kujundzic M, Velepic M. Cartilage palisade tympanoplasty in children and adults: Long term results. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;76(5):663–6. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.01.036
[11]. Kazikdas KC, Onal K, Boyraz I, Karabulut E. Palisade cartilage tympanoplasty for management of subtotal perforations: A comparison with the temporalis fascia technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;264(9):985–9.
[12]. Demirpehlivan IA, Önal K, Arslanoglu S, Songu M, Ciger E, Can N. Comparison of different tympanic membrane reconstruction techniques in type I tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;268:471–4. (Doi: 10.1007/s00405-010-1473-y)
[13]. Vashishth A, Mathur NN, Choudhary SR, Bhardwaj A. Clinical advantages of cartilage palisades over temporalis fascia in type I tympanoplasty. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2014;41(5):422–7. Doi:10.1016/j.anl.2014.05.015
[14]. Jeffery CC, Shillington C, Andrews C, Ho A. The palisade cartilage tympanoplasty technique: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2017;46(1):1–6.
[15]. Dornhoffer JL. Hearing Results With Cartilage Tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope. 1997 Aug;107(8):1094-9
[16]. Kirazli T, Bilgen C, Midilli R, Ögüt F. Hearing results after primary cartilage tympanoplasty with island technique. Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2005;132(6):933–7.
[17]. Onal K, Arslanoglu S, Oncel S, Songu M, Kopar A, Demiray U. Perichondrium/cartilage island flap and temporalis muscle fascia in type I tympanoplasty. J Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2011 Aug;40(4):295–9.
[18]. Onal K, Arslanoglu S, Songu M, Demiray U, Demirpehlivan IA. Functional results of temporalis fascia versus cartilage tympanoplasty in patients with bilateral chronic otitis media. J Laryngol Otol. 2012;126(1):22–5.
[19]. De Seta E, De Seta D, Covelli E, Viccaro M, Filipo R. Type I tympanoplasty with island chondro-perichondral tragal graft: The preferred technique? J Laryngol Otol. 2013;127(4):354–8.
[20]. Shin S, Lee W, Kim H, Lee H. Wheel-shaped cartilage-perichondrium composite graft for the prevention of retraction pocket development. Acta Oto-Laryngologica,. 2007;127: 25-28.
Figure 1 Illustrations for wheel-shaped composite cartilage graft (WsCCG).
Image 1 Prepared wheel-shaped composite cartilage graft and postoperative view.
Table 1 The mean and standard deviation of age, preoperative audiometric tests and follow-up period in cartilage groups.
Table 2 Graft take rates and Chi-Square test statistic according to cartilage groups.
Table 3 The mean and standard deviation of postoperative audiometric tests according to cartilage groups.
Table 4 Multiple comparisons of the graft groups for postoperative PTA, ABG closure