References
  1. Lung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J . 2003;24(13):1231-1243. doi:10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00201-x
  2. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J . 2017;38(36):2739-2791. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391
  3. Coisne A, Pontana F, Aghezzaf S, et al. Utility of Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography for Mitral Annular Sizing in Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Procedures: A Cardiac Computed Tomographic Comparative Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr . 2020;33(10):1245-1252.e2. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2020.04.030
  4. Hirasawa K, Vo NM, Gegenava T, et al. Mitral Valve Annulus Dimensions Assessment with Three-Dimensional Echocardiography Versus Computed Tomography: Implications for Transcatheter Interventions. J Clin Med . 2021;10(4):649. Published 2021 Feb 8. doi:10.3390/jcm10040649
  5. Khandheria BK, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Transesophageal echocardiography. Mayo Clin Proc . 1994;69(9):856-863. doi:10.1016/s0025-6196(12)61788-1
  6. Smith BB, Rehfeldt KH, Meinhardt JR, Smith MM. Safety and feasibility of transesophageal echocardiography in patients with prior esophageal surgery. Echocardiography . 2020;37(9):1430-1435. doi:10.1111/echo.14840
  7. Hilberath JN, Oakes DA, Shernan SK, Bulwer BE, D’Ambra MN, Eltzschig HK. Safety of transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr . 2010;23(11):1115-1221. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2010.08.013
  8. Leitman M, Peleg E, Rosenblat S, et al. Transesophageal echocardiography–an overview. Isr Med Assoc J . 2001;3(3):198-206.
  9. Hillenbrand KD, Racine CL, McNeil JS, Kleiman AM. Difficult TEE Probe Placement: The Evidence, Troubleshooting Techniques, and a Guide to Alternative Monitoring Options for Intraoperative Physicians. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth . 2019;23(4):369-378. doi:10.1177/1089253219842836
  10. Min JK, Spencer KT, Furlong KT, et al. Clinical features of complications from transesophageal echocardiography: a single-center case series of 10,000 consecutive examinations. J Am Soc Echocardiogr . 2005;18(9):925-929. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2005.01.034
  11. Lancellotti P, Tribouilloy C, Hagendorff A, et al. Recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment of native valvular regurgitation: an executive summary from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging . 2013;14(7):611-644. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jet105
  12. Godoy IE, Bednarz J, Sugeng L, Mor-Avi V, Spencer KT, Lang RM. Three-dimensional echocardiography in adult patients: comparison between transthoracic and transesophageal reconstructions. J Am Soc Echocardiogr . 1999;12(12):1045-1052. doi:10.1016/s0894-7317(99)70100-8
  13. Valocik G, Kamp O, Visser CA. Three-dimensional echocardiography in mitral valve disease. Eur J Echocardiogr . 2005;6(6):443-454. doi:10.1016/j.euje.2005.02.007
  14. Faletra FF, Leo LA, Paiocchi VL, et al. Anatomy of mitral annulus insights from non-invasive imaging techniques. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging . 2019;20(8):843-857. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jez153
  15. Mahmood F, Gorman JH 3rd, Subramaniam B, et al. Changes in mitral valve annular geometry after repair: saddle-shaped versus flat annuloplasty rings. Ann Thorac Surg . 2010;90(4):1212-1220. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.119
  16. Beaudoin J, Thai WE, Wai B, Handschumacher MD, Levine RA, Truong QA. Assessment of mitral valve adaptation with gated cardiac computed tomography: validation with three-dimensional echocardiography and mechanistic insight to functional mitral regurgitation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging . 2013;6(5):784-789. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000561
  17. Anwar AM, Soliman OI, Nemes A, et al. Assessment of mitral annulus size and function by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography in cardiomyopathy: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr . 2007;20(8):941-948. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2007.01.026
  18. Maffessanti F, Gripari P, Pontone G, et al. Three-dimensional dynamic assessment of tricuspid and mitral annuli using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging . 2013;14(10):986-995. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jet004
  19. Biaggi P, Jedrzkiewicz S, Gruner C, et al. Quantification of mitral valve anatomy by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in mitral valve prolapse predicts surgical anatomy and the complexity of mitral valve repair. J Am Soc Echocardiogr . 2012;25(7):758-765. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2012.03.010
  20. Sonne C, Sugeng L, Watanabe N, et al. Age and body surface area dependency of mitral valve and papillary apparatus parameters: assessment by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr . 2009;10(2):287-294. doi:10.1093/ejechocard/jen237
  21. Mihăilă S, Muraru D, Piasentini E, et al. Quantitative analysis of mitral annular geometry and function in healthy volunteers using transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr . 2014;27(8):846-857. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2014.04.017
  22. Gripari P, Mapelli M, Bellacosa I, et al. Transthoracic echocardiography in patients undergoing mitral valve repair: comparison of new transthoracic 3D techniques to 2D transoesophageal echocardiography in the localization of mitral valve prolapse. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging . 2018;34(7):1099-1107. doi:10.1007/s10554-018-1324-2
  23. Vo NM, van Wijngaarden SE, Marsan NA, Bax JJ, Delgado V. Assessment of D-Shaped Annulus of Mitral Valve in Patients with Severe MR Using Semi-Automated 4-Dimensional Analysis: Implications for Transcatheter Interventions. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis . 2020;7(4):E48. Published 2020 Nov 1. doi:10.3390/jcdd7040048
  24. Jassar AS, Vergnat M, Jackson BM, et al. Regional annular geometry in patients with mitral regurgitation: implications for annuloplasty ring selection. Ann Thorac Surg . 2014;97(1):64-70. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.048
  25. Noack T, Janietz M, Lurz P, et al. Dynamic mitral valve geometry in patients with primary and secondary mitral regurgitation: implications for mitral valve repair†. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg . 2019;56(5):983-992. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezz096
  26. Okamoto H, Fujimoto Y, Teramoto C. Novel Trigone-Based Sizing Method for Mitral Ring Annuloplasty. Ann Thorac Surg . 2020;109(5):1385-1393. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.08.085
  27. Ma W, Ye W, Zhang J, Zhang W, Wu W, Kong Y. Impact of different annuloplasty rings on geometry of the mitral annulus with fibroelastic deficiency: the significance of aorto-mitral angle. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging . 2018;34(11):1707-1713. doi:10.1007/s10554-018-1383-4
  28. Francis L, Finley A, Hessami W. Use of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography to evaluate mitral valve morphology for risk stratification prior to mitral valvuloplasty. Echocardiography . 2017;34(2):303-305. doi:10.1111/echo.13441
  29. Goldstein D, Moskowitz AJ, Gelijns AC, et al. Two-Year Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Severe Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation. N Engl J Med . 2016;374(4):344-353. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1512913
  30. Guerrero M, Wang DD, Pursnani A, et al. A Cardiac Computed Tomography-Based Score to Categorize Mitral Annular Calcification Severity and Predict Valve Embolization. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging . 2020;13(9):1945-1957. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.03.013
  31. Hirasawa K, Vo NM, Gegenava T, et al. Mitral Valve Annulus Dimensions Assessment with Three-Dimensional Echocardiography Versus Computed Tomography: Implications for Transcatheter Interventions. J Clin Med . 2021;10(4):649. Published 2021 Feb 8. doi:10.3390/jcm10040649