References
1. Stewart, E., Cookson, C., Gandolfo, R. and Schulze-Rath, R., 2017.
Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: a systematic review. BJOG: An
International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 124(10),
pp.1501-1512.
2. Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. 2022. Fibroids.
[online] Available at:
<https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/patients/fertility/female-problems/fibroids/>
[Accessed 19 January 2022].
3. Younas, K., Hadoura, E., Majoko, F. and Bunkheila, A., 2016. A review
of evidence-based management of uterine fibroids. The Obstetrician &
Gynaecologist, 18(1), pp.33-42.
4. BMJ Best Practice. 2022. Uterine fibroids- treatment algorithm.
[online] Available at:
<https://bestpractice.bmj.com/topics/en-gb/567/treatment-algorithm>
[Accessed 19 January 2022].
5. Vercellini, P., Giorgio Crosignani, P., Mangioni, C., Imparato, E.,
Ferrari, A. and Giorgi, O., 1998. Treatment with a gonadotrophin
releasing hormone agonist before hysterectomy for leiomyomas: results of
a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. BJOG: An International
Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 105(11), pp.1148-1154.
6. Rcog.org.uk. 2013. Clinical recommendations on the use of UAE in the
management of fibroids. [online] Available at:
<https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/23-12-2013_rcog_rcr_uae.pdf>
[Accessed 19 January 2022].
7. Hehenkamp, W., Volkers, N., Donderwinkel, P., de Blok, S., Birnie,
E., Ankum, W. and Reekers, J., 2005. Uterine artery embolization versus
hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids (EMMY
trial): Peri- and postprocedural results from a randomized controlled
trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 193(5),
pp.1618-1629.
8. Pinto, I., Chimeno, P., Romo, A., Paúl, L., Haya, J., de la Cal, M.
et al., 2003. Uterine Fibroids: Uterine Artery Embolization versus
Abdominal Hysterectomy for Treatment—A Prospective, Randomized, and
Controlled Clinical Trial. Radiology, 226(2), pp.425-431.
9. Ruuskanen, A., Hippeläinen, M., Sipola, P. and Manninen, H., 2010.
Uterine artery embolisation versus hysterectomy for leiomyomas: primary
and 2-year follow-up results of a randomised prospective clinical
trial. European Radiology, 20(10), pp.2524-2532.
10. Moss, J., Cooper, K., Khaund, A., Murray, L., Murray, G., Wu, O., et
al., 2011. Randomised comparison of uterine artery embolisation (UAE)
with surgical treatment in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids
(REST trial): 5-year results. BJOG: An International Journal of
Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 118(8), pp.936-944.
11. Jun, F., Yamin, L., Xinli, X., Zhe, L., Min, Z., Bo, Z. et al.,
2011. Uterine artery embolization versus surgery for symptomatic uterine
fibroids: a randomized controlled trial and a meta-analysis of the
literature. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 285(5), pp.1407-1413.
12. Fonseca, M., Castro, R., Machado, M., Conte, T. and Girao, M., 2017.
Uterine Artery
Embolization and Surgical Methods for the Treatment of Symptomatic
Uterine Leiomyomas: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis Followed by
Indirect Treatment Comparison. Clinical Therapeutics, 39(7),
pp.1438-1455.e2.
13. Havryliuk, Y., Setton, R., Carlow, J. and Shaktman, B., 2017.
Symptomatic Fibroid Management: Systematic Review of the
Literature. JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons,
21(3), pp.e2017.00041.
14. Manyonda, I., Bratby, M., Horst, J., Banu, N., Gorti, M. and Belli,
A., 2011. Uterine Artery Embolization versus Myomectomy: Impact on
Quality of Life—Results of the FUME (Fibroids of the Uterus:
Myomectomy versus Embolization) Trial. CardioVascular and Interventional
Radiology, 35(3), pp.530-536.
15. Mara, M., Maskova,
J., Fucikova, Z., Kuzel, D., Belsan, T. and Sosna, O., 2007. Midterm
Clinical and First Reproductive Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparing Uterine Fibroid Embolization and Myomectomy. CardioVascular
and Interventional Radiology, 31(1), pp.73-85.
16. Manyonda, I., Belli, A., Lumsden, M., Moss, J., McKinnon, W.,
Middleton, L., et al., 2020. Uterine-Artery Embolization or Myomectomy
for Uterine Fibroids. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(5),
pp.440-451.
17. Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et
al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and
exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.
BMJ 2021;372:n160. doi:
10.1136/bmj.n160
18. Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al.,
2013.The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of
nonrandomised studies in
meta-analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
19. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I,
Cates CJ, Cheng H-Y., et al., 2019. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing
risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ; 366: l4898.
20. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program] (2020). The Cochrane
Collaboration. Version 5.4.
21. Edwards, R., Moss, J., Lumsden, M., Wu, O., Murray, L., Twaddle, S.,
et al., 2007. Uterine-Artery Embolization versus Surgery for Symptomatic
Uterine Fibroids. New England Journal of Medicine, 356(4), pp.360-370.
22. Ananthakrishnan, G., Murray, L., Ritchie, M., Murray, G., Bryden,
F., Lassman, S., et al., 2012. Randomized Comparison of Uterine Artery
Embolization (UAE) with Surgical Treatment in Patients with Symptomatic
Uterine Fibroids (REST Trial): Subanalysis of 5-Year MRI
Findings. CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 36(3),
pp.676-681.
23. Gupta, J., Sinha, A., Lumsden, M. and Hickey, M., 2012. Uterine
artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database
of Systematic Reviews,.
24. Van der Kooij, S., Bipat, S., Hehenkamp, W., Ankum, W., Reekers, J.,
2011. Uterine artery embolization versus surgery in the treatment of
symptomatic fibroids: a systematic review and metaanalysis. American
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 205(4), pp.317.e1-317.e18.
25. Tang, S., Kong, M., Zhao, X., Chen, J., Wang, C., Zhang, H., et al.,
2018. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy
of uterine artery embolization vs. surgery for symptomatic uterine
fibroids. Journal of Interventional Medicine, 1(2), pp.112-120.
26. Narayan, A., Lee, A., Kuo, G., Powe, N. and Kim, H., 2010. Uterine
Artery Embolization versus Abdominal Myomectomy: A Long-term Clinical
Outcome Comparison. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology,
21(7), pp.1011-1017.
27. Razavi, M., Hwang, G., Jahed, A., Modanloo, S. and Chen, B., 2003.
Abdominal Myomectomy Versus Uterine Fibroid Embolization in the
Treatment of Symptomatic Uterine Leiomyomas. American Journal of
Roentgenology, 180(6), pp.1571-1575.
28. Siskin, G., Shlansky-Goldberg, R., Goodwin, S., Sterling, K.,
Lipman, J., Nosher, J., et al., A Prospective Multicenter Comparative
Study between Myomectomy and Uterine Artery Embolization with Polyvinyl
Alcohol Microspheres: Long-term Clinical Outcomes in Patients with
Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids. Journal of Vascular and Interventional
Radiology, 17(8), pp.1287-1295.
29. Goodwin, S., Bradley, L., Lipman, J., Stewart, E., Nosher, J.,
Sterling, K., et al., 2006. Uterine artery embolization versus
myomectomy: a multicenter comparative study. Fertility and Sterility,
85(1), pp.14-21.
30. Broder, M., Goodwin, S., Chen, G., Tang, LJ., Costantino, MM.,
Nguyen, MH et al., 2002. Comparison of long-term outcomes of myomectomy
and uterine artery embolization. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 100(5),
pp.864-868.
31. Spies JB, Warren EH, Mathias SD, Walsh SM, Roth AR, Pentecost MJ.
1999. Uterine fibroid embolization: measurement of health related
quality of life before and after therapy. J Vasc Interv
Radiol;10:1293–303.