α Fecundity between ND18 lines was compared using
Tukey’s post hoc test. Letter after value denotes sig. dif. at P
< 0.05.
β A t-test was used to compare fecundity for lines
246-8 and 576N-27.
§ Survival data was fit to lognormal distribution for
estimates of 50% survival. Letter after value indicates sig. dif.
(P < 0.05) by Wilcoxon test.
|
α Fecundity between ND18 lines was compared using
Tukey’s post hoc test. Letter after value denotes sig. dif. at P
< 0.05.
β A t-test was used to compare fecundity for lines
246-8 and 576N-27.
§ Survival data was fit to lognormal distribution for
estimates of 50% survival. Letter after value indicates sig. dif.
(P < 0.05) by Wilcoxon test.
|
α Fecundity between ND18 lines was compared using
Tukey’s post hoc test. Letter after value denotes sig. dif. at P
< 0.05.
β A t-test was used to compare fecundity for lines
246-8 and 576N-27.
§ Survival data was fit to lognormal distribution for
estimates of 50% survival. Letter after value indicates sig. dif.
(P < 0.05) by Wilcoxon test.
|
α Fecundity between ND18 lines was compared using
Tukey’s post hoc test. Letter after value denotes sig. dif. at P
< 0.05.
β A t-test was used to compare fecundity for lines
246-8 and 576N-27.
§ Survival data was fit to lognormal distribution for
estimates of 50% survival. Letter after value indicates sig. dif.
(P < 0.05) by Wilcoxon test.
|
α Fecundity between ND18 lines was compared using
Tukey’s post hoc test. Letter after value denotes sig. dif. at P
< 0.05.
β A t-test was used to compare fecundity for lines
246-8 and 576N-27.
§ Survival data was fit to lognormal distribution for
estimates of 50% survival. Letter after value indicates sig. dif.
(P < 0.05) by Wilcoxon test.
|